Search Results for "Award Quashed"

2549 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2549 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Case - Applications for Re-determination of Compensation Held Time-Barred. Limitation under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, not extended to claimants who failed to apply for certified copy of Court's award.

The acquiring body, the Executive Engineer of Jalna Minor Irrigation Division, filed writ petitions challenging awards passed under Section 28A of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Landowners’ Challenge to Land Acquisition Award and Corrigendum After 31 Years Due to Invalid Inclusion. Corrigendum Issued Without Statutory Power to Modify Final Award Beyond Reasonable Time Declared Void, and Award Excluding Landowners’ Land Not Binding.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Late Ahamad Izzat Mohammed Hasham Dada, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Lok Adalat Award in Motor Accident Claim Due to Lack of Claimants' Signatures on Settlement Memo. Lok Adalat Award Set Aside as Settlement Memo Not Signed by Claimants, Violating Section 20 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, and Appeal Restored for Merits Hearing.

The dispute arose from a motor accident claim where the husband and father of the petitioners died in a road traffic accident. The Motor Accidents Cla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Executing Court's Orders on Stamp Duty Calculation for Arbitration Award Execution. Stamp duty on award under Article 11(b) of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 is payable on principal amount only, not on interest and costs.

The petitioner, Shriram City Union Finance Ltd., a finance company, had initiated arbitration proceedings against the respondents for recovery of an o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act in Property Development Dispute. Petitioners Argue Award is Unreasoned and Arbitrator Failed to Independently Analyze Submissions, Seeking Set Aside.

Background: The matter involved a property development dispute concerning three tribal (Adivasi) lands in Malad, Mumbai. The petitioners were legal he...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Amended Land Acquisition Award for Lack of Notice. Amendment to final award under Section 13A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 held invalid without prior notice to interested persons.

The petitioners, who were interested persons in a land acquisition proceeding, challenged the amended award dated 2-7-1998 passed by the Sub-Divisiona...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contractor/Developer's Challenge to Majority Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute. Court upholds award of Rs.7,35,000, Rs.10,80,000, interest, and costs under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

The petitioner, M/s. Raviuday Construction Co., a partnership firm, challenged a majority arbitral award dated 15 May 2012 passed by a three-member ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Award for Non-Compliance with 2013 Act — Mandamus Issued for Fresh Award Under Section 26. Land Acquisition Proceedings Initiated Under 1894 Act but Award Passed After 2013 Act Came into Force Must Comply with Compensation Provisions of 2013 Act.

The petitioner, M/s. Deco Equipments Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash an awar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Modified Supplementary Award in National Highway Acquisition Case — Restores Original Award Due to Lack of Notice and Violation of Natural Justice. Competent Authority Cannot Unilaterally Reduce Compensation Without Hearing Landowners Under National Highways Act, 1956.

The petitioners, Sangeeta Natwarlal Karwa and Natwarlal Navneetlal Karwa, owned 4 acres of land in Gat No.37/1/2 at Valsang, Solapur. For the purpose ...