Bombay High Court Quashes Amended Land Acquisition Award for Lack of Notice. Amendment to final award under Section 13A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 held invalid without prior notice to interested persons.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 34
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, who were interested persons in a land acquisition proceeding, challenged the amended award dated 2-7-1998 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Gadhinglag Division. The final award had originally been passed on 28-5-1998. Subsequently, the Land Acquisition Officer issued notices under Section 13A(2) regarding an amendment to the award, which related to the calculation of the final amount of compensation payable. The petitioners contended that once the final award was passed, it was not permissible for the officer to amend it without prior notice to them. The court examined the provisions of Section 13A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, which allows for amendment of an award but requires notice to interested persons before making the amendment. The court found that the amendment was carried out without giving prior notice to the petitioners, which was a violation of the statutory requirement. The court quashed the amended award and directed the respondents to proceed in accordance with law, giving proper notice to the petitioners before any amendment. The decision emphasizes that procedural safeguards under Section 13A must be strictly followed.

Headnote

A) Land Acquisition - Amendment of Award - Section 13A Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Notice Requirement - The Land Acquisition Officer amended the final award dated 28-5-1998 on 2-7-1998 without prior notice to the petitioners. The court held that the amendment was not permissible as no notice was given to the interested persons before making the amendment, violating Section 13A(2) of the Act. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the amendment of a final award under Section 13A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is permissible without prior notice to the interested persons.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed the amended award dated 2-7-1998 and directed the respondents to proceed in accordance with law, giving proper notice to the petitioners before any amendment.

Law Points

  • Amendment of award under Section 13A of Land Acquisition Act
  • 1894 requires prior notice to interested persons
  • Amendment cannot be made without notice even if it is a calculation error
  • Final award cannot be amended without following procedure under Section 13A(2)
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005:BHC-AS:16584-DB

WRIT PETITION NO.4022 OF 1998

2005-09-14

R.M.S. Khandeparkar, V.M. Kanade

2005:BHC-AS:16584-DB

Shri A.D. Thorat for the Petitioners, Ms M.P. Thakur for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2

Smt. Shevanta Rama Waingade, Dattatraya Vithal Patil, Maruti Bhagoji Nandawadekar, Baloo Ravaji Waingade, Pandurang Ranaba Waingade, Suresh Sabarao Patil

The State of Maharashtra, Sub-Divisional Officer Gadhinglag Division, The Bank of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the amended award under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of the amended award dated 2-7-1998.

Filing Reason

The amendment to the final award was made without prior notice to the petitioners.

Previous Decisions

Final award was passed on 28-5-1998; thereafter notices under Section 13A(2) were issued regarding amendment on 2-7-1998.

Issues

Whether the amendment of a final award under Section 13A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is permissible without prior notice to the interested persons.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that once the final award was passed, it was not permissible for the Land Acquisition Officer to amend it without prior notice to the petitioners or interested persons.

Ratio Decidendi

Amendment of an award under Section 13A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 requires prior notice to interested persons; without such notice, the amendment is not permissible.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners challenge the amended award dated 2-7-1998 on the ground that the amendment of the nature which has been carried out is not permissible in terms of the provisions of law comprised under Section 13A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894... and secondly that the same has been passed without notice to the petitioners.

Procedural History

Final award passed on 28-5-1998. Notices under Section 13A(2) issued regarding amendment on 2-7-1998. Petitioners filed writ petition challenging the amended award.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Section 13A, Section 13A(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Amended Land Acquisition Award for Lack of Notice. Amendment to final award under Section 13A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 held invalid without prior notice to interested persons.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Writ Petition for Default Bail in Corruption Case Involving Piecemeal Chargesheets. Court Holds That Right to Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC Accrues Upon Expiry of Statutory Period If Investigation Incomplete, and Pieceme...