Search Results for "Appeal under Section 30(1)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Appeal under Section 30(1)"

384 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 384 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.

13 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

8 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Disqualifying Related Parties of Corporate Debtors from Submitting Resolution Plans. The Court holds that the disqualification under Section 29A(c) applies to persons acting jointly or in concert with a disqualified person, and that the provision is not retrospective in operation.

3 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment on the interpretation and validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition by State Against Order Rejecting Application to Recall Witnesses in Spl.C. No.828/2018 — Held That Trial Court Erred in Holding That Recall Application Was Not Maintainable After Commencement of Trial Under Section 311 Cr.P.C. The High Court set aside the order and allowed the recall application subject to costs, directing expeditious trial.

28 Aug 2024

The State of Karnataka, through the Special Public Prosecutor, filed a Criminal Revision Petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by States of Karnataka and Kerala in Lottery Tax Dispute — State Legislatures Have Competence to Tax Lotteries Under Entry 62 List II. Regulatory Entry 40 List I Does Not Bar State Taxation of Lotteries Organised by Other States.

23 Mar 2022

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the States of Karnataka and Kerala against judgments of their respective High Courts which had struck down sta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Settlement Commission's Reduction of Interest Under Section 220(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Settlement Commission Has Power to Reduce Interest Under Section 220(2) When Settling Case Under Chapter XIX-A, and Such Reduction Does Not Require Prior Payment of Interest.

9 Dec 2021

The Union of India and the Commissioner of Income Tax filed a writ petition challenging two orders dated 05/06/1998 and 04/08/1999 passed by the Incom...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging GST on Lotteries — Holds Lottery as Actionable Claim and Movable Property Under CGST Act. Levy of GST on Face Value of Lottery Tickets Without Abating Prize Money Upheld as Constitutional.

3 Dec 2020

The petitioner, Skill Lotto Solutions Pvt. Ltd., an authorized agent for sale and distribution of lotteries organized by the State of Punjab, filed a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Abetment of Suicide and SC/ST Act Case — Prima Facie Case Not Made Out as Deceased Was Not a Member of Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe. The court held that since the deceased was not a member of Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe, the offences under the SC/ST Act are not attracted, and there is no prima facie case under Section 306 IPC.

7 Sep 2020

The judgment pertains to three criminal appeals filed by accused persons in Crime No.24 of 2020 registered at Sirsala Police Station, Beed, for offenc...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court Order Granting Permission to Private Person to Conduct Prosecution Under Section 302 CrPC. Permission Cannot Be Granted Mechanically Merely Because Applicant Is an Aggrieved Party; Exceptional Circumstances Required.

9 Aug 2019

The appeal arose from an order of the Bombay High Court allowing respondent No. 2 (the complainant) to conduct prosecution under Section 302 of the Co...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Respondent's Right to Compensation in Land Acquisition Dispute — Aforamento Grant Confers Absolute Title After Payment of Foro for 20 Years. The court held that the respondent, as heir of the aforamento grantee, is entitled to the entire compensation under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, rejecting the appellant Comunidade's claim based on revenue records.

26 Apr 2018

The case involves a land acquisition dispute where the Government acquired 12,800 sq.mtrs from survey no.89/2 of village Chorao for a Village Panchaya...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)