Search Results for "uniform payment"

655 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 655 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Challenge to Majority Arbitral Award in Insurance Dispute — JSW Steel Ltd. v. ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. — Challenge to Rejection of Claims Under Fire, Marine, and Business Interruption Policies Dismissed as No Patent Illegality Found.

The Petitioner, JSW Steel Ltd., engaged in steel manufacturing, had insured its plant at Toranagallu, Karnataka, under five insurance policies issued ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek to Quash Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and BDA Act, 1976 for Scheme Area.

The judgment is from the High Court of Karnataka, presided over by Justice Anand Byrareddy, dated 11th July 2014. It pertains to a batch of writ petit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Municipal Circular Revising Hoarding Advertising Licence Fees. Petition Questions Validity of 2009 Circular Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act Sections 328A and 479.

The matter involved consolidated writ petitions filed by outdoor advertising firms and an association challenging licence fee revisions imposed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assistant Professor's Challenge to Superannuation at Age 60, Holds AICTE Retirement Age of 65 Applicable to Private Self-Finance Standalone Institution. Goa Institute of Management's Faculty Manual Fixing Retirement Age at 60 is Overridden by AICTE Regulations.

The petitioner, Dr. Vilasini Devi Nair, was appointed as an Assistant Professor at the Goa Institute of Management (GIM), a private self-finance stand...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court held that the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contractual clauses was plausible and not patently illegal.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd., entered into a contract with the respondent, Jai Laxmi Constructions Engineers An...