Search Results for "mortgage enforcement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "mortgage enforcement"

398 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 398 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets Pre-Deposit Requirement Under Section 18 of SARFAESI Act in Appeals by Borrowers and Secured Creditors. The court held that pre-deposit is mandatory, computed based on the amount claimed in the notice under Section 13(2), excluding future interest, with adjustments for recoveries after filing the petition under Section 17.

23 Apr 2025

The Supreme Court of India, in a group of appeals, addressed the interpretation of Section 18 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial As...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Against Bank Forfeiture — Directs Refund of Rs.24.10 Lakhs Deposit with Interest. Forfeiture of deposit without contractual authority in auction sale is arbitrary and unjust, warranting refund with interest at 6% per annum.

20 Apr 2022

The petitioner, P Balaji Babu, participated in an auction conducted by the State Bank of India (respondent No.1) for the sale of immovable property ow...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Auction Dispute, Reversing High Court's Declaration of Auction as Null and Void. Dispute Involved Title to Land Under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and Validity of Auction by Development Authority, with Trial Court Upholding Auction and High Court Overturning It.

5 Aug 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, which allowed a first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Proc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Share Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Non-Delivery of Shares and Limitation Were Not Perverse or Contrary to Law.

4 May 2021

The appellant, M/s Satish K. Narang & Co., an investor, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against the ju...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Bank's Revision in SARFAESI Act Suit — Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Barred. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Regarding Personal Guarantee Held Maintainable as It Does Not Relate to Enforcement of Security Interest Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act.

20 Jul 2017

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Allahabad Bank against an order of the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Nagpur, rejecting t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Sales Tax Notices Against Axis Bank in Liquidation Proceeding — No Liability for Tax Deducted at Source Under MVAT Act After Company's Winding Up. The Court held that the State cannot recover tax from a secured creditor who had no obligation to deduct tax at source under Section 42 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, as the deduction obligation arises only when payment is made to the dealer, and after winding up, the Official Liquidator is the proper authority.

7 Mar 2017

The petitioner, Axis Bank Ltd., a banking company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Guarantors and Borrowers. Court Holds That Section 17(1) of SARFAESI Act Provides an Alternative Remedy to Challenge Possession Notices and That Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Should Not Be Entertained When Statutory Remedy Is Available.

5 Jul 2016

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 11th September 2015 passed by the Chief Metr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up of S. Kumars Nationwide Ltd. for Inability to Pay Debts. Multiple financial creditors and operational creditors successfully proved the company's insolvency under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

1 Jul 2016

The judgment concerns a batch of company petitions filed by various financial creditors and operational creditors seeking the winding up of S. Kumars ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Winding Up Order in Securitisation Act Case — SICA Reference Barred by Amendment. The Court held that the amendment to Section 15 of SICA by the Securitisation Act bars a reference to BIFR where financial assets have been acquired by a securitisation company, and Section 22 of SICA does not apply to proceedings initiated by such a company.

20 Jul 2012

The appeal arose from an order of the learned Single Judge dated 21 October 2010 admitting a company petition for winding up and directing advertiseme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Specific Performance of Development Agreement in Favor of Purchasers. Agreement for Development Treated as Agreement for Sale Under Specific Relief Act, 1963 as Essential Terms Constitute Sale of Immovable Property.

18 Jul 2012

The appellants, original defendants, were the owners of a property in Pune. They executed a development agreement dated 18th October 2007 in favor of ...

17 18 19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)