Search Results for "election petition amendment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "election petition amendment"

928 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 928 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs State Election Commission to Hold Elections for Mangalore City Corporation Within Six Weeks — Failure to Conduct Elections Within Five Months of Expiry of Term Violates Article 243U of Constitution of India. The court held that the constitutional mandate under Article 243U(3)(a) requires elections to be completed before the expiry of the term of the Corporation, and the inaction by the State Election Commission was unjustified.

27 Aug 2019

The petitioners, residents of Mangalore, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a directio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Election Programme of Cooperative Sugar Factory on Ground of Premature Interference. Court Holds That Once Election Process Commences, Remedy Lies in Election Petition Under Section 91 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, Not in Writ Petition.

22 Feb 2012

The petitioners, members of a cooperative sugar factory (Respondent No.3), challenged the election programme for the society's committee, alleging irr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Trust Elections to Proceed Despite Challenge Under Section 41A of Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 — Interim Relief Denied as No Prima Facie Case of Irregularity Established. Court Held That the Assistant Charity Commissioner's Order Restraining Declaration of Results Was Without Jurisdiction as the Election Process Was Already Commenced and No Urgent Necessity Was Shown.

8 Aug 2012

The petitioners, Mahavir Jaina Vidyalaya and others, are a public trust registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950, formed in 1915 with the o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment on Validity of Delimitation Notifications for Panchayat Constituencies. Petitioners Challenged Increase in Seats and Alleged Non-Compliance with Census Guidelines.

19 Aug 2021

The petitioners, residents and aspiring candidates for Zilla and Taluk Panchayat elections in Karnataka, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 2...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Co-operative Society Resolution and Voter List for Violation of Bye-laws and Natural Justice. Resolution No. 10 and 13 dated 08/08/2025 and voter list quashed as 6th respondent was not a member of the 5th respondent society and thus ineligible to be a delegate.

26 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Shankar Gopalkrishna Bhat, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karn...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Multiple Petitions Challenging Reservation of Wards in Urban Local Body Elections. Court Examines Validity of State Government Notifications Reserving Wards for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Backward Classes, and Women Under Relevant Municipal Laws.

14 Jan 2019

The writ petitions were filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the reservation notifications dated 10.08.2018 and 3...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Directly Elected Sarpanch Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion by Gram Sabha Invalid Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Directly Elected Sarpanch Under Section 30A-1A Cannot Be Removed by Gram Sabha; Only Voters Who Elected Him Can Pass No-Confidence Motion.

12 Jan 2022

The petitioner, Amol Pandurang Godbole, was directly elected as Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Balirampur in the 2017 general election, a post reserved...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion. Disqualification under Section 14(1)(j-1) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 applies only to candidates for election, not to sitting members, and the no-confidence motion was validly passed.

1 Dec 2023

The Petitioner, Vitthal Rajaram Shitole, was the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Koregaonmul. He filed a writ petition challenging a no-confidence motion p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Member Under Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Challenge Raises Issue of Jurisdiction to Entertain Disqualification Complaint After Elections Without Filing Election Petition Under Section 15.

18 Sep 2012

The writ petition arose from proceedings under the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. The petitioner was elected from Ward No.4 of Gram Panchayat Kh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Election Process of Agriculture Produce Market Committee — No Interference in Mid-Election Process Under Article 226. Inclusion of Names in Voters List Cannot Be Challenged After Election Process Has Commenced; Remedy Lies in Election Petition Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

22 Jan 2016

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Chandrashekhar Shivram Mudkanna and Shamshoddin Ghudulal Jamadar against the State of Maharashtra...

17 18 19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)