High Court of Karnataka Directs State Election Commission to Hold Elections for Mangalore City Corporation Within Six Weeks — Failure to Conduct Elections Within Five Months of Expiry of Term Violates Article 243U of Constitution of India. The court held that the constitutional mandate under Article 243U(3)(a) requires elections to be completed before the expiry of the term of the Corporation, and the inaction by the State Election Commission was unjustified.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Prosecution
  • 13
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, residents of Mangalore, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the State Election Commission (second respondent) to take all necessary steps for holding elections to constitute the Mangalore City Corporation (third respondent). The Corporation was constituted under the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976, and its term expired on 12th March 2019. Despite the constitutional mandate under Article 243U(3)(a) that elections must be completed before the expiry of the term, no election process had commenced even after five months. The court heard the counsel for the petitioners, the Additional Government Advocate for the State, the Senior Counsel for the State Election Commission, and the counsel for the Corporation. The court noted that the Corporation consists of elected councillors, nominated councillors, and certain members of Parliament and State Legislature, and its term is five years under Section 8 of the Act. The court observed that the failure to hold elections within the stipulated time was a clear violation of the constitutional mandate. The court directed the State Election Commission to take all necessary steps for the purpose of holding elections to constitute the Corporation within six weeks from the date of the order. The court also directed the State Government to provide all necessary assistance to the Commission for conducting the elections. The petition was disposed of with these directions.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Municipal Elections - Article 243U of the Constitution of India - Mandatory Election Before Expiry of Term - The term of the Mangalore City Corporation expired on 12th March 2019, but even after five months, no election process had commenced. The court held that this inaction violates the constitutional mandate under Article 243U(3)(a) which requires elections to be completed before the expiry of the term. The court directed the State Election Commission to take all necessary steps to hold elections within six weeks. (Paras 2-5)

B) Public Interest Litigation - Local Self-Government - Delay in Holding Elections - The petition was filed as a Public Interest Litigation seeking directions to hold elections for the Mangalore City Corporation. The court entertained the petition and issued directions to the State Election Commission to expedite the election process. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the failure to hold elections for the Mangalore City Corporation within five months after the expiry of its term on 12th March 2019 violates the constitutional mandate under Article 243U of the Constitution of India, and whether the State Election Commission should be directed to take immediate steps for holding elections.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the State Election Commission (second respondent) to take all necessary steps for the purpose of holding elections to constitute the Mangalore City Corporation (third respondent) within six weeks from the date of the order. The State Government was directed to provide all necessary assistance. The petition was disposed of.

Law Points

  • Article 243U of the Constitution of India
  • Section 6
  • 7
  • 8 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act
  • 1976
  • Mandatory holding of municipal elections before expiry of term
  • Duty of State Election Commission to conduct elections
  • Public Interest Litigation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (08) 3

Writ Petition No.33056 of 2019 (LB-RES-PIL)

2019-08-27

Hon'ble Mr. Abhay S. Oka, Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Nawaz

Shri Nitin A.M. for petitioners; Shri S.S. Mahendra, AGA for R1; Shri K.N. Phaneendra, Senior Counsel for Smt. Vaishali Hegde for R2; Shri Giridhar H. for R3

Mr. Abdul Gafoor and Mr. Mohammed Haneef

State of Karnataka, The State Election Commission, The Mangalore City Corporation

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Public Interest Litigation seeking direction to hold elections for Mangalore City Corporation.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought a writ directing the State Election Commission to take all necessary steps for holding elections to constitute the Mangalore City Corporation.

Filing Reason

The term of the Mangalore City Corporation expired on 12th March 2019, but no election process had commenced even after five months, violating Article 243U of the Constitution.

Issues

Whether the failure to hold elections for the Mangalore City Corporation within five months after the expiry of its term violates Article 243U of the Constitution of India. Whether the State Election Commission should be directed to take immediate steps for holding elections.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the inaction in holding elections violates the constitutional mandate under Article 243U. Respondents did not oppose the petition; the State Election Commission submitted that it would take steps.

Ratio Decidendi

The constitutional mandate under Article 243U(3)(a) requires that elections to constitute a Municipal Corporation must be completed before the expiry of its term. Failure to do so is a violation of the Constitution, and the State Election Commission is duty-bound to conduct elections expeditiously.

Judgment Excerpts

The term of the third respondent expired on 12th March 2019. In fact, considering the mandate of sub-clause (a) of clause (3) of Article 243U of the Constitution of India, the process of the election to constitute Corporation ought to have been completed before 12th March 2019. But, even five months thereafter, the process of election has not yet commenced. Hence, we direct the second respondent to take all necessary steps for the purpose of holding election for constituting the third respondent-Corporation within six weeks from today.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed on an unspecified date in 2019. It came up for orders on 27th August 2019, when the court heard the parties and passed the final order.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226, Article 227, Article 243U, Part IXA
  • Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976: Section 6, Section 7, Section 8
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Directs State Election Commission to Hold Elections for Mangalore City Corporation Within Six Weeks — Failure to Conduct Elections Within Five Months of Expiry of Term Violates Article 243U of Constitution of India. The cour...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition in Guarantee Dispute Due to Lack of Privity of Contract. Guarantee Agreement Held Unenforceable as Principal Debtor Was Not a Party to the Contract Under Indian Contract Act, 1872.