CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 645 OF 2013
16 Oct 2018...
Search Results for "Rule 222"
673 result(s) found
Found 673 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...
- 66
High Court
- 64
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Loknatya Kala Kendra Licences by Tahsildar for Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Acting Under Dictation. The Court Held that a Licensing Authority Must Exercise Independent Discretion and Cannot Cancel a Licence Merely on Directions of Superior Officer Without Applying Its Own Mind.
27 Sep 2012The two writ petitions arose from the cancellation of licences granted to the petitioners for running Loknatya Kala Kendras (folk art centres) in vill...
- 19
High Court
- 25
High Court
Writ Petition No. 3410 of 2004
6 Oct 2017The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard two writ petitions together. The petitioners, former Branch Manager and Accountant of ...
- 35
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.
10 Nov 2016The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...
- 89
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Criminal Appeal Regarding Reliability of Dying Declarations in Dowry Death and Murder Case. Appellant Challenges Conviction Under Sections 302 and 498A IPC Based on Multiple Dying Declarations with Alleged Infirmities.
6 Aug 2018The appeal was preferred by the appellant Shaikh Babar Shaikh Noor against the judgment and order dated 30th September 2013 passed by the Sessions Jud...
- 28
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Madras Converts Writ Petition into Suo Motu Public Interest Litigation for Investigation into Illegal Beach Sand Mining. The Court Clarifies that the Scope Covers All Beach Sand Minerals and that Amendments to MMDR Act, 1957 and Atomic Concession Rules, 2016 Do Not Render the PIL Infructuous for the Period Prior to 2016.
17 Feb 2025The case originated as a writ petition filed by Dr. G. Victor Rajamanickam concerning allegations of massive illegal mining and sale of Beach Sand Min...
- 85
