Search Results for "Prosecutrix testimony"

517 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 517 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Consent. Allegations under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and Atrocity Act fail as victim's testimony is unreliable and medical evidence does not support prosecution case.

The State of Gujarat filed an acquittal appeal under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, challenging the judgment and order dated 10.01....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inherent Improbability and False Implication — Conviction Under Section 376 IPC Set Aside on Grounds of Preponderance of Probabilities.

The appellant, Rajesh s/o Kewalramji Chute, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Bhandara, for offences under Section 376 IPC (rape) and Section 506 I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in Rape of Minor Case Under POCSO Act — Seven-Year RI Maintained. Testimony of Prosecutrix Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Prompt FIR.

The appellant, Sanjay s/o Vijay Nawghade, was convicted by the Special Judge, Chandrapur, in Special (Child) Case No. 5 of 2014 for offences under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of two appellants, Prafulla Vinayak Nage and Atul Shrikrishna Bhadake, under Section 376(2)(g) (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction of Godfather for Rape of Mentally Retarded Woman Under Section 376(2)(l) IPC — Evidence of Mental Disability and Eyewitness Testimony Sufficient to Sustain Conviction

The appellant, Tiofilo Evangelio Moraes @ Mories, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Margao in Sessions Case No.20/2013 for an offence pu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Considers Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 376/511 and 506 IPC and SC/ST Act – Appeal Filed Against Conviction Citing Delay in FIR and Inconsistent Evidence

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, by Hiralal Kasam Shaikh, challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape of Minor in Absence of Direct Evidence of Penetration. Circumstantial Evidence and Medical Report Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Section 376(2)(f) IPC.

The appellant, Deepak Shankarrao Borkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, in Special Case No. 7 of 2012 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Rape and POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Consent of Minor is Irrelevant but Prosecution Failed to Prove Sexual Assault Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Gorakshya Arjun Mahakal, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO), Kalyan, for offences punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Consent Proof. Conviction under Sections 376 and 417 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Forcible Sexual Intercourse Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Angad Tikaram Chandane, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 376 (rape) and 417 (cheating) of the Indian Penal ...