Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Consent Proof. Conviction under Sections 376 and 417 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Forcible Sexual Intercourse Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Angad Tikaram Chandane, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 376 (rape) and 417 (cheating) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 9 years and 7 months respectively. The prosecution alleged that the accused had forcible sexual intercourse with the prosecutrix on multiple occasions without her consent and later cheated her by not marrying her. The High Court, on appeal, scrutinized the evidence and found material inconsistencies in the prosecutrix's testimony. The court noted that the prosecutrix admitted to having a consensual relationship and that the accused had expressed willingness to marry her. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove the essential ingredients of rape, particularly the absence of consent, and that the charge of cheating was not made out as there was no dishonest inducement. Consequently, the court allowed the appeal, set aside the conviction and sentence, and acquitted the appellant.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Rape - Consent - Sections 375, 376 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - The court examined whether the sexual intercourse was consensual or forcible. The prosecutrix's testimony was inconsistent and lacked corroboration. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove absence of consent beyond reasonable doubt, and the accused was entitled to acquittal. (Paras 1-10)

B) Criminal Law - Cheating - Section 417 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - The court considered whether the accused cheated the prosecutrix by promising marriage. The evidence showed that the relationship was consensual and the promise of marriage was not made with dishonest intent. The court held that the conviction under Section 417 IPC was also unsustainable. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Sections 376 and 417 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 is sustainable based on the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Conviction and sentence set aside. Appellant acquitted of all charges. Bail bonds cancelled.

Law Points

  • Consent in sexual offences
  • Standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt
  • Corroboration of prosecutrix testimony
  • Benefit of doubt
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (02) 23

Criminal Appeal No.160 of 2017

2018-02-28

P.R. Bora

Mr. Swapnil S. Rathi for Appellant, Mr. R.B. Bagul for Respondent-State, Mr. V.P. Narwade for Respondent No.2

Angad S/o. Tikaram Chandane

The State of Maharashtra, Sangeeta d/o. Narayan Nadre

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for rape and cheating

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction under Sections 376 and 417 IPC

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted by trial court and sentenced to imprisonment

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant on 06.04.2017 in Sessions Case No.145 of 2012

Issues

Whether the prosecution proved the offence of rape under Section 376 IPC beyond reasonable doubt? Whether the conviction under Section 417 IPC for cheating is sustainable?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the prosecutrix was a consenting party and the relationship was consensual. Prosecution argued that the accused forcibly raped the prosecutrix and cheated her by promising marriage.

Ratio Decidendi

The prosecution must prove absence of consent beyond reasonable doubt in rape cases. Inconsistencies in the prosecutrix's testimony and lack of corroboration entitle the accused to benefit of doubt.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant has filed the present appeal against the Judgement and order passed by learned Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani in Sessions Case No.145 of 2012 decided on 06.04.2017. The appellant was prosecuted in the aforesaid Sessions Case for the offences punishable under Sections 376 and 417 of Indian Penal Code.

Procedural History

Trial court convicted appellant on 06.04.2017. Appellant filed appeal on same day. High Court reserved judgment on 22/12/2017 and pronounced on 28/02/2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 376, 417
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Consent Proof. Conviction under Sections 376 and 417 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Forcible Sexual Intercourse Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Petition under Section 114 r/w Order 47 Rule 1 CPC fails as petitioners seek re-argument on merits, not correction of e...