Search Results for "Gram Panchayat Election"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Gram Panchayat Election"

438 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 438 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal of Gram Panchayat President Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion Invalid as Notice Did Not Comply with Rule 3(2) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Motion of No Confidence Against Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Gram Panchayat) Rules, 1994. The court held that the requirement of specifying the date of meeting in the notice is mandatory, and non-compliance renders the motion void.

8 Feb 2019

The appellant, Smt. Gopemma, was the President of Gram Panchayat Nirna. A notice of no-confidence motion was given by 14 members of the Gram Panchayat...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Challenge to No-Confidence Motion Notice During Model Code of Conduct. MCC Guidelines Not Applicable to Statutory Duty of Convening No-Confidence Meeting Under Section 49(1) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.

26 Feb 2020

The case involved a writ petition filed by Smt. Vanajakshi, the Adhyaksha of Javagal Gram Panchayat, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, c...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions by Non-Members Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat Members — Petitioners Lack Locus Standi. No-Confidence Motion Validly Passed Under Section 49 of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.

19 Jan 2016

The petitioners, who are residents and social workers of Ujani village, filed writ petitions challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the m...

High Court

Bombay High Court Addresses Conflicting Precedents on Procedural Mandates for No Confidence Motions Under Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Reference to Larger Bench Examines Whether Formal Motion and Seconding Requirement Under Rule 17 of Meeting Rules is Mandatory or Directory.

9 Oct 2014

The appeal before the Bombay High Court arose from a no confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Theur, Pune. The appellant, wh...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Disqualification of Taluk Panchayat Member in Election Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice as Show Cause Notice Not Served. Disqualification under Section 12(1) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 set aside due to lack of opportunity of hearing.

11 Jun 2015

The petitioner, Smt. Palakshamma, was elected as a Taluk Panchayat Member of Davangere Taluk Panchayat. On 12.11.2013, one Sri. Chinnasamudra Shekar N...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Zilla Panchayat Election Dispute — Section 14 of Limitation Act Applicable to Election Petitions Under Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the time spent in prosecuting an election petition in a court without jurisdiction can be excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

16 Aug 2019

The appellant, Sri K. Narayana Reddy, contested the election to the Kolar Zilla Panchayat along with the first respondent and two others. The election...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Batch of Petitions Challenging APMC Nagpur Election Process and Government Orders Extending Board Tenure

16 Jan 2018

The judgment pertains to multiple writ petitions and a contempt petition concerning the elections and administration of the Agricultural Produce Marke...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of 50% Reservation for Women in Gram Panchayats — Rule 3(1)(c) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Reservation of Seats for Women) Rules, 1995 Held Intra Vires the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Article 243D of the Constitution.

9 Oct 2014

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Shri Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dis...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Notice for No-Confidence Motion Against Grama Panchayat President Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory 15-Day Notice Period Under Section 49(2A) of Karnataka Grama Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the notice period is mandatory, not directory, and quashed the notice that provided only 7 days instead of the required 15 days.

11 Sep 2019

The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging notices for no-confidence mot...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Interim Order in Panchayat Election Dispute, Reinstates Single Judge's Decision on Alternative Remedy Under Uttarakhand Panchayati Raj Act and Constitutional Bar Under Article 243-O

2 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Appellant against the interim order of Uttarakhand High Court Division Bench which had stayed the Single...

17 18 19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)