Search Results for "distinction between public order and law and order"

3324 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3324 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Mediclaim Policy Renewal Dispute — Insurer Must Disclose Material Changes in Coverage at Renewal. Renewal of Insurance Policy is Not a Fresh Contract; Insurer Owed Duty to Inform Insured of Restrictive Terms Under Principle of Utmost Good Faith.

The appellants, Jacob Punnen and his wife, held a Mediclaim policy with United India Insurance Co. Ltd. since 1982, renewed annually. In March 2008, t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu's Retraction of Statement Not Considered by Detaining Authority

The petitioner, son of the detenu Balwinder Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a detention order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case Due to Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Unexplained Delay. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority failed to establish live-link between alleged activities and public order disturbance.

The petitioner challenged a detention order passed under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 (MPDA Act) and its subsequent ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cheating Case Due to Purely Civil Nature of Dispute — Non-Payment of Dues Does Not Attract Criminal Breach of Trust Under Section 406 IPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd. and its office bearers against the order of the Allahabad High Court which h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interlocutory Order as Not Maintainable Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Order Rejecting Permission to File Fresh Valuation Report Is Not an Interim Award and Cannot Be Challenged Under Section 34.

The dispute arises from a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) dated 22.12.2003 between Dilip Timblo (appellant) and Prashant Timblo (respondent). The appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty for Non-Certification of Annexures to Return of Allotment Under Section 39(5) of Companies Act, 2013 — Default Under Section 39(4) Relates Only to Filing of Return, Not Certification of Annexures.

The petitioners, N.S.J.L Nidhi Ltd and its officers, challenged an order dated October 11, 2023, by which a Learned Adjudicating Officer imposed a pen...