KAHC010202972018_1
21 Dec 2018...
Search Results for "valuation procedure"
1125 result(s) found
Found 1125 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order Returning Plaint in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Held That Court Fee Valuation Determines Jurisdiction, Not Market Value of Property. Dispute pertained to suit for possession and mesne profits where trial court ordered return of plaint for lack of pecuniary jurisdiction based on market value, but High Court held that under Section 7(v) of the Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958, court fee is payable on the amount claimed as mesne profits, and jurisdiction is determined by that valuation.
7 Mar 2014The judgment arises from three writ petitions filed by the defendants (M/s Vasudeva Rao & Sons and its partner) challenging a common order dated 12.3....
- 62
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — Upholds Arbitrator's Findings on Debit Balance and Share Valuation. The Court held that the arbitrator's award was not perverse or contrary to law, and that the scope of interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is limited.
14 Feb 2012The petitioner, Mahesh Daulatram Changrani, was a constituent/client of the respondent, Religare Securities Ltd., a trading member of the National Sto...
- 101
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Auction Sale of Mortgaged Property Under Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 — No Ground to Set Aside Sale After Certificate Issued and No Appeal Filed.
27 Feb 2023The petitioners, Si2 Microsystems Pvt. Ltd. and its director Sanjay Vedaprakash Soni, availed a cash credit facility of Rs. 10 crores and a term loan ...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Land Acquisition Compensation Award. Market Value Determined by Ready Reckoner Rates Upheld for Recreational Ground Reservation.
15 Feb 2019The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai challenged an award dated 3rd November 2017 by the Sub-Divisional Officer, which determined compensation o...
- 118
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition by Legal Heirs and Subsequent Purchaser Challenging District Registrar's Order Directing Registration of Sale Deed. Petitioners Contend Appeal Filed After Five Years Was Barred by Limitation and District Registrar Lacked Jurisdiction Under Section 72 of the Registration Act, 1908.
11 Feb 2026The dispute centered on a sale deed dated 18.02.1988 that was presented for registration but refused by the Sub-Registrar for non-production of the in...
- 31
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Determined Based on Previous Award for Similar Land Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court upheld the Reference Court's enhancement of compensation, holding that a previous award for similar land in the same village is a relevant basis for determining market value.
9 Mar 2022The State of Maharashtra, through its District Collector, Special Land Acquisition Officer, and Executive Engineer, filed two appeals under Section 18...
- 40
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Trial Court Decree in Suit for Declaration — Petitioner Granted Opportunity to File Written Statement. Failure to File Written Statement Does Not Automatically Entitle Plaintiff to Judgment Under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC.
7 Jul 2026The petitioner, Sri Raja R, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 22.02.2022 passed by the X...
- 88
High Court
Bombay High Court Enhances Royalty for Court Receiver's Property in License Dispute. Court modifies Receiver's order fixing royalty at Rs.45,000 per month and enhances to Rs.1,50,000 per month based on valuation report and market rates.
6 Sep 2013The plaintiff filed a chamber summons seeking modification of the Court Receiver's order dated 24 August 2010 fixing royalty at Rs.45,000 per month fo...
- 52
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Taxing Master's Order on Court Fees in Property Suit — Court Fees Must Be Paid on Current Market Value Under Section 5 of Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959. Plaintiff's Challenge to Order Directing Payment of Court Fees on Current Market Value Dismissed as Consent Decree in Prior Suit Does Not Affect Court Fee Liability in Subsequent Suit.
24 Jul 2013The plaintiff, Smt. Hema Valecha, filed a Chamber Summons challenging an order dated 2nd May 2011 passed by the learned Taxing Master of the Bombay Hi...
- 106
