Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

KAHC010202972018_1

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-11-01 05:39:13
  • 101
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010202972018_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (KAR) (12) 7

W.P. Nos.48194-48198/2018 & 48669-673/2018 (EDN-RES) c/w connected matters

2018-12-21

Krishna S. Dixit

Lakshminarayana, Anusha L, Vijayshankar, N K Ramesh

Dr. Menaka Mohan, Dr. Gogineni Sri Harsha, Dr. Sreeramaiah, Dr. H N Veena, Dr. Dyaneshwar Nirgude, Dr. Aravinda V, Dr. Srinivas M Deodurg, Dr. Malleshi H, Dr. Kuppusamy R, Dr. Aravind D R

The Registrar (Evaluation), Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bangalore Medical College and Research Centre, Jaya Jagadguru Murugharajendra Medical College, M R Medical College, Vydhei Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Command Hospital Air Force

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking revaluation of answer scripts and implementation of university ordinances.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of a resolution dated 04.08.2018, direction to implement ordinance dated 28.05.2016, provide model key answers, and revaluation of answer papers.

Filing Reason

Alleged irregularity in evaluation of answer scripts and non-compliance with the university's multiple valuation ordinance.

Procedural History

Multiple writ petitions were filed and clubbed together for hearing before the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: 226, 227
  • Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences Act, 1994: 35(4)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
revaluation answer scripts university ordinance medical education Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences multiple valuation key answers

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Employees' Right to Bonus Under Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 — Clarifies Applicability Despite Authorised Controller Appointment. 2026-11-01 07:42:48
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Directs Proper Evaluation of Hemophilia Disability for NEET Admission - Petitioner with 20% Hemophilia Disability Held Eligible for Medical Course Admission After Proper Assessment by Special Medical Board 2026-11-01 07:42:44
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition murder natural justice acquittal compensation burden of proof Land Acquisition limitation jurisdiction Article 226
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Developer's Challenge to Arbitration Award — ...

High Court Quashes School Tribunal's Order on Employee Reinstatement Due to Procedural Irr...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in IPC Sections 376, 420, 493, 494, and 495 Case...

Supreme Court Restores Appellate Tribunal's Order on Tariff Determination Due to Breach of...

Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Challenge to High Court Orders in Civil Appeal — Legal...

Lost Your Password?