KAHC010202972018_1

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 83
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010202972018_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (KAR) (12) 7

W.P. Nos.48194-48198/2018 & 48669-673/2018 (EDN-RES) c/w connected matters

2018-12-21

Krishna S. Dixit

Lakshminarayana, Anusha L, Vijayshankar, N K Ramesh

Dr. Menaka Mohan, Dr. Gogineni Sri Harsha, Dr. Sreeramaiah, Dr. H N Veena, Dr. Dyaneshwar Nirgude, Dr. Aravinda V, Dr. Srinivas M Deodurg, Dr. Malleshi H, Dr. Kuppusamy R, Dr. Aravind D R

The Registrar (Evaluation), Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bangalore Medical College and Research Centre, Jaya Jagadguru Murugharajendra Medical College, M R Medical College, Vydhei Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Command Hospital Air Force

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking revaluation of answer scripts and implementation of university ordinances.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of a resolution dated 04.08.2018, direction to implement ordinance dated 28.05.2016, provide model key answers, and revaluation of answer papers.

Filing Reason

Alleged irregularity in evaluation of answer scripts and non-compliance with the university's multiple valuation ordinance.

Procedural History

Multiple writ petitions were filed and clubbed together for hearing before the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: 226, 227
  • Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences Act, 1994: 35(4)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MRT Order in Tenancy Dispute — Petitioner's Tenancy Rights Upheld Based on Long-Standing Cultivation and Payment of Rent. The court held that the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal exceeded its revisiona...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302 and 394 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.