Search Results for "semen"

317 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 317 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appeal Dismissed: Court Upholds 10-Year Imprisonment for Sexual Assault of a Minor. The Bombay High Court affirms the conviction under IPC and POCSO Act, dismissing the appellant's claims of false implication and procedural lapses.

The Bombay High Court dismissed an appeal challenging a 10-year rigorous imprisonment sentence handed down by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Sexual Assault Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Section 377 IPC and Section 8(2) of Goa Children's Act, 2003 set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Rukmuddin Kudminchi, was convicted by the Children's Court for the State of Goa in Special Case No.52/2011 for offences under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Mentally Challenged Woman Under Section 376(2)(l) IPC. Evidence of Victim's Mental Condition and Consistent Testimony of Witnesses Sufficient to Prove Forcible Sexual Intercourse.

The appellant, Raju Jaishriram Telgote, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akot in Sessions Case No. 64/2015 for offences under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(1), 341, 506, 109 IPC and Sections 4, 12, 17 POCSO Act set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellants, Kisan Damaji Naik and Ramesh Abidas Vasave, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nandurbar, in Sessions Case No. 01/2018 for offences...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363, 366-A, 376, 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Milind s/o Govind Pandit, was convicted by the IV Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Beed in Sessions Case No.17/2003 on 1/10/2003 for of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Medical Evidence and Witness Testimony Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Manoj s/o Harihar Shukla, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO), Ahmednagar, in Special (POCSO) Case No.199 of 2017 for offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Mangesh Chandankhede, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-1, Nagpur, for offences under Section 376(2)(i) of the Indian Pena...