Search Results for "refusal endorsement"

407 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 407 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition in Eviction Case Based on Bonafide Need Under C.P. & Berar Rent Control Order, 1949 — Reversing Appellate Court's Dismissal of Suit.

The petitioner, Tirathdas Pokhardas Kalda, aged about 83 years, is the owner of a house at Teen Nal square, Nagpur, which includes a shop block of abo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Cruelty in Bride Burning Case — Dying Declaration Recorded by Police Constable Held Admissible. The court found the dying declaration reliable and corroborated, affirming life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Datta s/o Kisan Gaikwad, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Omerga in Sessions Case No. 23 of 2005 for the murder of his w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Divorce Decree for Lack of Proper Service of Summons in Hindu Marriage Act Case. Service of summons must be at correct address and refusal must be properly proved; ex parte decree without proper service is a nullity.

The appellant, Deepali Pratap Sonawane, the wife, challenged the judgment and decree dated 10th February 2012 passed by the Family Court, Aurangabad i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Rasiklal Makhanji Solanki, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Vidya Prabhudesai by pouring kerosene and setting her ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree in Recovery Suit — Sets Aside Order Rejecting Application Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC. Failure to Serve Summons Properly and Lack of Knowledge of Proceedings Constitute Sufficient Cause for Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree.

The appellant, Shri K. Raja, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against an order d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Writ Petition Against Industrial Tribunal Award. Award Directed Reinstatement of Workman Dismissed During Conciliation as Void Under Section 33(1)(a) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The dispute arose from the charge-sheet issued on 28 January 1997 by M/s. Gulf Air to its employee Vinod Malhotra, a Passenger Service Supervisor and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder in Dowry Death Case — Husband Set Wife on Fire After Refusal to Give Money for Liquor. The court held that the dying declaration was reliable and sufficient for conviction under Section 304 IPC.

The appellant, Prakash Shivlal Chavan, was convicted under Section 304 of the Indian Penal Code for culpable homicide not amounting to murder for sett...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Rejection of Arbitration Petitions as Time-Barred. Service of Arbitral Award Under Section 31(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Held Valid When Sent by Registered Post to Correct Address.

The appellants, Apex Encon Projects Pvt. Ltd. and Padmavati Nekkanti, filed appeals against a common order dated 16th July 2014 passed by a learned Si...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Adjudicates Public Interest Petition Against Ministerial Orders on Land Reservation for Pune Telephones and Cooperative Housing Societies. The Court Considers Legality of Compromise Order and Subsequent Land Acquisition Proceedings in Light of Development Plan and ULC Act Provisions.

The petitioners, residents of Pune, filed a public interest petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the order dated 6.2.1991 (a com...