Search Results for "maharashtra village panchayats act"

239 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 239 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging VAT Investigation Post-GST. Section 78 of Maharashtra GST Savings Act Held Valid as It Continues VAT Act Only for One Year from Appointed Day as Permitted by Constitution Amendment.

The petitioner, Magma Fincorp Limited, a non-banking finance company registered under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (VAT Act), challenged ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Sarpanch Election Due to Alternative Remedy Under Section 16 of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961. Election Dispute Must Be Raised via Election Petition, Not Under Article 226.

The petitioner, Gokul Chandanmal Sangvi, a defeated candidate in the Sarpanch election of Grampanchayat Fagne, filed a writ petition under Article 226...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch Due to Invalid Votes by Resigned Members. Resignation of Grampanchayat Members Takes Effect Immediately Under Section 35(3A) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959, Rendering Their Participation in No-Confidence Motion Void.

The petitioner, Manjulabai Govind Dhumal, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Kantekur, Taluka Omerga, District Osmanabad. The Grampanchayat consisted o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Disqualification Under Section 14(h) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 for Non-Payment of House Tax — Holds That Disqualification Cannot Be Sustained When Tax Demand Was Not Proved to Be in Respect of the Member's Own House.

The petitioner, Ashok Bhimrao Mahure, was an elected member of the Gram Panchayat, Shendurjana Khurd, Taluq Tiwasa, District Amravati. The Gram Pancha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch Candidate in Gram Panchayat Election Disqualification Case Due to Non-Submission of Caste Validity Certificate. Second Proviso to Section 101A of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 Permits Submission Within Three Months of Election, Disqualification Set Aside.

The petitioner, Smt. Sangeeta Sanjay Lakhote, was a candidate for the post of Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Butibori, Nagpur. She was disqualified by th...