Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch Candidate in Gram Panchayat Election Disqualification Case Due to Non-Submission of Caste Validity Certificate. Second Proviso to Section 101A of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 Permits Submission Within Three Months of Election, Disqualification Set Aside.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 10
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Smt. Sangeeta Sanjay Lakhote, was a candidate for the post of Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Butibori, Nagpur. She was disqualified by the respondents on the ground that she did not annex a caste validity certificate along with her nomination form. The petitioner challenged this disqualification by filing a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The court considered the provisions of Section 101A of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958, which requires every person desirous of contesting an election to a reserved seat to submit along with the nomination paper a caste certificate and a validity certificate issued by the Scrutiny Committee. However, the second proviso to Section 101A allows a candidate to submit the validity certificate within a period of three months from the date of election. The petitioner argued that even if she failed to submit the validity certificate along with the nomination form, the second proviso protected her. The respondents contended that the disqualification was in conformity with Section 101A. The court, after hearing arguments and perusing the provisions, held that the second proviso to Section 101A permits submission of the validity certificate within three months from the date of election, and therefore the disqualification was not sustainable. The court allowed the petition and set aside the disqualification.

Headnote

A) Panchayat Law - Disqualification - Caste Validity Certificate - Section 101A, Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 - Second proviso to Section 101A permits submission of caste validity certificate within three months from the date of election of the candidate - Petitioner was disqualified for not annexing caste validity certificate with nomination form - Court held that the second proviso protects the candidate and disqualification was not sustainable - Petition allowed (Paras 2-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a candidate contesting for the post of Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat can be disqualified for not annexing caste validity certificate along with nomination form, in light of the second proviso to Section 101A of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the disqualification of the petitioner, and directed that the petitioner be permitted to contest the election subject to compliance with the second proviso to Section 101A of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

Law Points

  • Second proviso to Section 101A of Bombay Village Panchayats Act
  • 1958 allows submission of caste validity certificate within three months from date of election
  • disqualification for non-submission along with nomination is not automatic
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (BOM) (03) 177

Writ Petition No: 6153 / 2010

2011-03-03

D.D. Sinha, A.P. Bhangale

Mr. Pradeep Marpakwar for petitioner, Mr. Anand Fulzele (AGP) for Respondents 1,2 & 5, Mr. H. Gadhia for Respondent No.3

Smt. Sangeeta Sanjay Lakhote

The State of Maharashtra, Additional Collector Nagpur, Block Development Officer Nagpur, Gram Panchayat Butibori, Caste Scrutiny Committee I and Special Welfare Officer Nagpur, Mahendrasingh Gulabsingh Chavan

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging disqualification from contesting election for post of Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to set aside the disqualification and allow her to contest the election

Filing Reason

Petitioner was disqualified for not annexing caste validity certificate along with nomination form

Issues

Whether the disqualification of the petitioner for not annexing caste validity certificate along with nomination form is sustainable in law in view of the second proviso to Section 101A of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that second proviso to Section 101A allows submission of validity certificate within three months from date of election, so disqualification is not sustainable Respondents argued that disqualification is in conformity with Section 101A and sustainable in law

Ratio Decidendi

The second proviso to Section 101A of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 permits a candidate to submit the caste validity certificate within a period of three months from the date of election, and therefore disqualification for non-submission along with nomination form is not automatic and cannot be sustained.

Judgment Excerpts

Grievance of the petitioner in the present Writ Petition is in respect of action of disqualifying the petitioner from contesting the election for the post of Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Butibori, on the ground that the petitioner did not annex caste validity certificate along with the nomination form submitted by the petitioner for contesting the said post. Second proviso to section 101A of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 contemplates that the validity certificate can be submitted within a period of three months from the date of election of the candidate.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the disqualification order. The court heard arguments and delivered judgment on 3rd March 2011.

Acts & Sections

  • Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958: 101A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch Candidate in Gram Panchayat Election Disqualification Case Due to Non-Submission of Caste Validity Certificate. Second Proviso to Section 101A of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 Permits Submission Within Three Mo...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Contradictions in Testimony of Wife and Daughter Create Reasonable Doubt Under Section 376 IPC.