Search Results for "landlord's claim"

1137 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1137 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Decree for Rent Default. Tenant Failed to Pay Rent for Over a Decade, No Dispute as to Standard Rent or Permitted Increases, Case Falls Under Section 12(3)(a) of Bombay Rent Act.

The dispute pertains to a suit for eviction filed by the landlady, Mrs. Kusum Pandurang Keni, against the tenant, Sudhir Kumar Sengupta (since decease...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlords' Petition in Rent Control Case — Reverses Appellate Order Dismissing Eviction Suit. Landlords' Bonafide Need for Demolition and Reconstruction Established Under Section 13(1)(hhh) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

The petitioners, who are the landlords of the suit premises, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order of the District Judge, Solapur, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Revenue Tribunal's Order in Tenancy Dispute Under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Landlord's Application for Possession Under Section 70(b) Dismissed as Not Maintainable Due to Lack of Tenancy Relationship.

The case involves a dispute under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. The petitioners, legal heirs of Laxman Hari Tambe, filed a writ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition in Rent Default Case — Tenant Failed to Pay Rent for Six Months Despite Demand Notice. Appellate Court's Decree of Eviction Under Section 12 of Bombay Rent Act Upheld as Tenant Did Not Tender Rent Within One Month of Notice.

The petitioner, Arun Anant Tavkar, was a tenant of Flat No.3, Suyesh, Phirozshaw Mehta Road, Vile Parle (East), Bombay. The respondent, Smt. Suhas Yes...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Land Dispute — No Interference Under Article 227 as Findings of Fact Are Not Perverse. The court held that concurrent findings of fact based on evidence cannot be interfered with under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the petitioners (heirs of the original plaintiff) challenging the concurrent findings of the lower courts i...