Search Results for "exemption scheme"

1122 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1122 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows JSW Steel's Challenge to Electricity Duty Demand on Captive Consumption. Held that electricity generated from captive power plant and consumed for own use is not 'sold' and thus not exigible to electricity duty under the Bombay Electricity Duty Act, 1958.

The petitioner, M/s. JSW Steel Limited, a company engaged in steel manufacturing, operates a captive power plant (CPP) at its factory in Raigad, Mahar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rules Against Stamp Duty on Amalgamation Orders Under Companies Act, 1956. Court Order Sanctioning Scheme of Amalgamation Is Not a Conveyance Under Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.

The case involved a reference under the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958, arising from a scheme of amalgamation between Reliance Industries Limited (transferee)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Career Advancement Scheme Benefits to Lecturers Appointed Before NET/SET Became Mandatory. Services Rendered Prior to Acquisition of NET/SET Qualification Must Be Counted for Career Advancement Under UGC Regulations.

The petitioners, Krishna Kautik Valvi and Surekha Pandit Palve, were appointed as lecturers in 1995 by the Khandesh College Education Society's Moolje...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging CRB Order Imposing Cost Recovery Charges on CFS Operator. Policy Decision Not Subject to Judicial Review Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Sarveshwar Logistics Services Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes ULC Act Demand for Excess Land Due to Repeal and Non-Completion of Proceedings. Demand for Rs 6,09,66,477 raised under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 set aside as proceedings were not finalized before the Act's repeal and the land was not vested in the State.

The petitioners, nine individuals, filed a writ petition challenging a demand of Rs 6,09,66,477 raised by the District Collector and Competent Authori...