WRIT PETITION NO. 5204 OF 2019
20 Nov 2019The present writ petition was filed by six petitioners, including two public limited companies and four individuals, challenging an order dated 30.05....
Search Results for "enabling proviso"
854 result(s) found
Found 854 result(s)
High Court
COMM ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 543 OF 2025
29 Jul 2026The background of the case involves the acquisition of land admeasuring 1113.2 sq. mtrs. belonging to the predecessor of Respondents 1 and 2 by the Pe...
- 40
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification. Petitioners Alleged Notification Ultra Vires Article 246 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, Seeking to Quash Demand Notices.
3 Dec 2015A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, corporations, and individuals, including National ...
- 79
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Petitioner to File Written Statement in Commercial Suit Despite Delay — Emphasizes Liberal Approach Under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC and Commercial Courts Act. The court set aside orders of Commercial Court that had precluded the defendant from filing written statement, holding that the Commercial Court erred in mechanically rejecting the application for time without considering the reasons for delay and the lack of prejudice to the plaintiff.
26 Jul 2019The petitioner, Vedanta Limited, challenged two orders of the Commercial Court at Panaji in Special Civil Suit (Commercial) No.84 of 2017. The first o...
- 179
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Will Dispute Case — High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Preliminary Decree Set Aside. Registered Will Fails to Meet Attestation Requirements Under Section 63(c) of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Evidence Act, 1872.
17 Dec 2019The case concerns a dispute over a tenement originally allotted to Suhagwanti Devi, the wife of late Harbans Lal, under a redevelopment scheme. After ...
- 161
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Examines Validity of Uttar Pradesh Reservation in Promotion Rules Under Articles 16(4A) and 16(4B) of Constitution. Conflicting High Court Decisions on Requirement of Quantifiable Data for Backwardness and Inadequacy of Representation Lead to Appeals.
1 Aug 2026The case originated from a batch of civil appeals preferred by the U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. and the State of Uttar Pradesh challenging conflicting ...
- 70
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Clarifies Legal Standards for Reservation in Promotions for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Under Article 16(4-A) of the Constitution. The Court Held That There Is No Fixed Yardstick for Quantifiable Data Showing Inadequacy of Representation, and the State Must Collect Data Based on Cadre as the Unit, with Sampling Methods Permissible, While Affirming the Prospective Operation of M. Nagaraj v. Union of India.
28 Jan 2022The judgment arose from a batch of cases challenging reservation in promotions for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes under Article 16(4-A) of the ...
- 809
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Property Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Evidence. Court holds that the trial court did not err in rejecting application under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC for recalling witnesses, as the petitioners failed to demonstrate that the evidence sought to be adduced was not within their knowledge earlier.
14 Sep 2020The case arises from a civil revision petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) by the petitioners (defendants in th...
- 66
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification on Mining Leases; Examines Legislative Competence under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act.
3 Dec 2015A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the validity of Notification No. FEE/23/2007-08 dated 16.08.2008 is...
- 47
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows CBI Appeal in Disproportionate Assets Case — Further Investigation Under Section 173(8) CrPC Permitted Despite Earlier Closure Report. The Court held that the Special Court could take cognizance on a charge sheet filed after further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC even if a closure report under Section 173(2) CrPC had been previously accepted.
28 Apr 2023The case involves appeals by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against a High Court order quashing the prosecution of D. Dwarakanadha Reddy (A...
- 229
