Search Results for "bail jurisdiction"

2929 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2929 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court Order Holding Anticipatory Bail Maintainable Despite Custody in Another Case. Person in Custody Cannot Apprehend Arrest and Thus Cannot Seek Pre-Arrest Bail Under Section 438 CrPC.

The Supreme Court considered the question of whether an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Judicial Officer Discharged During Probation and Quashes Discharge Order. Discharge Based on Bail Order and Pending Inquiry Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice and Is Arbitrary Under Rajasthan Judicial Services Rules, 2010 and Article 233 of Constitution of India.

The dispute involved a judicial officer appointed as an Additional District Judge in 2013 under the Rajasthan Judicial Services Rules, 2010, who was d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Appellant in PMLA Case Due to Prolonged Incarceration and No Likelihood of Speedy Trial — Twin Conditions Under Section 45 PMLA Relaxed as Bail is Rule and Jail is Exception.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Prem Prakash against the judgment of the High Court of Jharkhand which had dismissed his bail application in a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail to Applicant in Cheating and Forgery Case — Investigation Complete, No Custodial Interrogation Required. Pre-arrest bail allowed under Section 438 CrPC for offences under Sections 246, 318, 337, 339, 340 BNS as investigation complete and applicant cooperated.

The applicant, Haribhau Dnyandev Chemte, filed an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking pre-arrest bail in co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restores Pre-Arrest Bail in Investment Fraud Case — Suppression of Facts Not Proven. Cancellation of anticipatory bail set aside as the applicant had not suppressed material facts and the cancellation was based on unsubstantiated allegations.

The case involves an application by Rajesh Thomas Menzes challenging an order dated 11 May 2023 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vasai, which ...