High Court Grants Bail to Police Officers Accused of Abetment to Suicide and Murder Under SC/ST Act — Prima Facie Case Not Made Out for Custodial Interrogation. Appellants, police officers, were granted bail under Section 14A(2) of SC/ST Act for offences under IPC and SC/ST Act, as the court found no prima facie case for custodial interrogation.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 84
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, by police officers (Nagraj, Sher Ali, and Prakash B) who were accused in connection with the death of a person belonging to a Scheduled Caste. The appellants were Head Constables and a Police Sub-Inspector at Mayakonda Police Station. The complainant, Vrundamma, alleged that her husband was wrongfully confined, assaulted, and later found dead, leading to charges under Sections 341, 342, 302, 306, 201 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(2)(v) and 3(2)(v-a) of the SC/ST Act. The trial court (II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Davanagere) rejected their bail application on 21.01.2021. The appellants challenged this order before the High Court. The High Court considered the submissions of the appellants' counsel, who argued that the appellants were innocent and had been falsely implicated, and that the investigation was complete. The State opposed bail, citing the gravity of the offences. The High Court, after examining the material on record, held that a prima facie case for custodial interrogation was not made out and that the appellants were entitled to bail. The court allowed the appeals, set aside the trial court's order, and granted bail to the appellants subject to conditions including furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 2,00,000 with two sureties, surrendering passports, and cooperating with the trial.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Bail - Section 14A(2) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Appellants, police officers, sought bail for offences under Sections 341, 342, 302, 306, 201 r/w 34 IPC and Sections 3(2)(v), 3(2)(v-a) of SC/ST Act - Trial court rejected bail - High Court allowed bail, holding that prima facie case for custodial interrogation was not made out and appellants were entitled to bail on conditions (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellants, police officers accused of offences including murder and abetment to suicide under the SC/ST Act, are entitled to bail under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST Act when the trial court rejected their bail application.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeals allowed. Order dated 21.01.2021 set aside. Appellants granted bail subject to conditions: personal bond of Rs. 2,00,000 with two sureties, surrender of passport, cooperation with trial, no tampering with evidence.

Law Points

  • Bail
  • Anticipatory Bail
  • Section 14A(2) SC/ST Act
  • Prima Facie Case
  • Custodial Interrogation
  • Abetment to Suicide
  • Murder
  • Wrongful Confinement
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (KAR) (06) 31

Criminal Appeal No. 394 of 2021 connected with Criminal Appeal No. 325 of 2021

2021-06-14

K. Somashekar

Sri. Shankarappa S (for appellants), Sri. Thejesh .P, HCGP (for R-1)

Nagraj, Sher Ali, Prakash B

State of Karnataka, Vrundamma

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeals against rejection of bail under Section 14A(2) of SC/ST Act

Remedy Sought

Setting aside of order dated 21.01.2021 and grant of bail

Filing Reason

Trial court rejected bail for offences under IPC and SC/ST Act

Previous Decisions

Order dated 21.01.2021 passed by II Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Davanagere rejecting bail

Issues

Whether the appellants are entitled to bail under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST Act? Whether a prima facie case for custodial interrogation exists?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued they are innocent and falsely implicated, investigation complete, no custodial interrogation needed. State opposed bail citing gravity of offences under SC/ST Act and IPC.

Ratio Decidendi

Bail can be granted under Section 14A(2) of SC/ST Act if prima facie case for custodial interrogation is not made out; appellants are entitled to bail on conditions.

Judgment Excerpts

This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 14A(2) of Schedule Case and Schedule Tribes Act of 1989, praying to, set aside the order dated 21.01.2021 passed by the II-Addl. District and Sessions Judge at Davanagere... The court allowed the appeals and granted bail to the appellants.

Procedural History

Trial court rejected bail on 21.01.2021; appellants filed appeals under Section 14A(2) of SC/ST Act before High Court; High Court allowed appeals on 14.06.2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989: 14A(2), 3(2)(v), 3(2)(v-a)
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 341, 342, 302, 306, 201, 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Grants Bail to Police Officers Accused of Abetment to Suicide and Murder Under SC/ST Act — Prima Facie Case Not Made Out for Custodial Interrogation. Appellants, police officers, were granted bail under Section 14A(2) of SC/ST Act for of...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Decree Holder's Appeal in Execution Proceedings — Transfer of Attached Property Void Under Section 64 CPC. Sale of Property by Judgment Debtor After Attachment Order Cannot Defeat Decree Holder's Right to Execute Decree.