Search Results for "alternate plot"

402 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 402 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Pre-emption Claim Under Section 22 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 — Testamentary Succession Bars Intestate Right. Property Devolution by Will Excludes Statutory Right of Pre-emption as Section 22 Applies Only to Intestate Property.

The case involves a dispute over a suit property (Plot No.21, Laxmi Nagar, Nagpur) originally purchased by late Kashinath Subhedar in the name of his ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes AGRC Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — Consent Terms Binding on Successor Developer. Petitioners' Entitlement to Two Shops of 409 Sq Ft Each Upheld Based on Consent Terms in Suit No.1994 of 2008.

The petitioners, Alphonso D'Souza and Vanessa D'Souza, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 5th January 2022 passed by the Apex Grievances...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Genuine and Enforceable Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Discrepancies in Pleadings.

The appellant, Harish, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 05.12.2008 allegedly executed by the respondents in his fav...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Possession Claim by Lessee in Company Liquidation — Official Liquidator Directed to Hand Over Property Subject to Lease. Leasehold Rights Survive Winding Up and Official Liquidator Must Respect Lessee's Right to Possession Under Section 456 of Companies Act, 1956.

The Provident Investment Company Ltd., a Government of Madhya Pradesh undertaking, filed an application seeking possession of leasehold land admeasuri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act — Petitioners Guilty of Suppression of Facts. Land Acquisition Lapse Claim Rejected as Petitioners Had Received Compensation and Suppressed Earlier Proceedings.

The petitioners, a husband and wife, filed two writ petitions before the Bombay High Court seeking a declaration that the acquisition of their lands b...