Search Results for "Director (Discipline)"

709 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 709 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Penalty Order by Head Master in Private School Employment Dispute -- Assistant Teacher Challenges Withheld Increment Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act 1977 and Rules 1981 -- Head Master Lacks Authority to Impose Penalty Without Management Resolution

The petitioner, an Assistant Teacher in a private school, challenged a penalty order imposed by the Head Master that withheld his annual increment -- ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Award to Compulsorily Retired Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity Under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Requires Willful Offence or Moral Turpitude, Not Mere Misconduct.

The petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Payment to Retired Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 requires proof of financial loss caused by employee's misconduct, not merely disciplinary punishment of compulsory retirement.

The petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Petitions of Contractual Teachers Challenging Termination Under Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan. Teachers appointed on contract basis have no right to regularization; government policy decision to discontinue scheme is valid.

The petitioners, contractual teachers appointed under the Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan (formerly Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan), challenged their termination by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Suo Motu Directions on Detention of Overstaying Foreign Nationals in Goa. The Court directed the State to consider establishing detention centres for overstaying foreign nationals and upheld the validity of FIR against a Nigerian national for overstay under the Foreigners Act, 1946.

The Bombay High Court at Goa, in a suo motu writ petition, addressed the issue of overstaying foreign nationals in the State of Goa. The matter origin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Guidelines for Detention of Overstaying Foreign Nationals in Suo Motu Writ Petition. Court directs State of Goa to establish detention centres and formulate standard operating procedures for handling foreign nationals who overstay their visas.

The Bombay High Court at Goa took suo motu cognizance of the issue of overstaying foreign nationals in the State of Goa, arising from a criminal writ ...