Search Results for "Constructive possession"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Constructive possession"

406 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 406 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Dismissal of Writ Petition Seeking Lapse of Land Acquisition Under BDA Act; HSR Layout Scheme Fully Implemented, Acquisition Completed. Appellant's Claim for Lapse Under Section 27 of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 and Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Rejected as Possession Taken and Third-Party Rights Created.

1 Dec 2020

The litigation arose from the acquisition of 20 guntas of land in Sy. No. 146 of Agara Village for the formation of HSR Layout by the Bengaluru Develo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Golf Course Construction in CRZ Area. Court holds that the subject land is not within CRZ limits based on the approved CRZ map, and the petitioner failed to establish any illegality in the permissions granted.

11 Feb 2022

The petitioner, Sunil Sureshchandra Agarwal, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Declaration of Withdrawal from Land Acquisition for Gavipuram Extension Layout. Court Holds That Section 48(1) Notification Not Gazetted Is Ineffective and Acquisition Completed in 1987 Bars Withdrawal.

21 Jul 2025

The petitioners, legal representatives of original grantees of 2 acres and 20 guntas of land in Sy. No. 26 of Nagadevanahalli Village, Bangalore, soug...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property.

28 Nov 2014

The appellants, who were the plaintiffs in the original suit, filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of suit proper...

High Court

NOTICE OF MOTION NO.955 OF 2018

2 May 2019

...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging IPAB's Dismissal of Trade Mark Rectification Under Trade Marks Act, 1999. The Court Examines the Interplay Between Common Law Rights and Registered Trade Marks, Specifically Sections 27(2), 28, 47, and 57, in Context of Deceptive Similarity Between 'ROFOL' and 'PROFOL'.

3 Apr 2012

The dispute between Medical Technologies Limited (petitioner) and Neon Laboratories Limited (respondent no.1) concerned the trade marks 'PROFOL' and '...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions for Alleged Wilful Disobedience of Earlier Judgment in SARFAESI Auction Dispute — No Contempt Made Out as Subsequent Transfers Were Not in Breach of Court Orders. The Court held that the earlier judgment did not contain any specific direction restraining transfers, and the respondents had acted under colour of subsequent orders from the DRT and High Court.

13 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed contempt petitions filed by Celir LLP, the successful auction purchaser, alleging wilful disobedience of its earlier judgm...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Landowners’ Challenge to Land Acquisition Award and Corrigendum After 31 Years Due to Invalid Inclusion. Corrigendum Issued Without Statutory Power to Modify Final Award Beyond Reasonable Time Declared Void, and Award Excluding Landowners’ Land Not Binding.

13 Jul 2026

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Late Ahamad Izzat Mohammed Hasham Dada, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Criminal Revision Against Summoning Order in Cheque Dishonour Case — Dispute Over Partnership Firm's Authority to File Complaint Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court held that a complaint under Section 138 must be filed by an authorized person, and partners are not automatically liable.

16 Sep 2025

The applicants, Romell Housing LLP and Jude Romell, filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court challenging the summoning order...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Allotment of Surplus Land Under Urban Land Ceiling Act. Petitioners' claim for housing scheme under Section 20 rejected as they failed to comply with statutory requirements and the land was already allotted to a trust.

23 Sep 2014

The petitioners, legal representatives of original landowners, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an ord...

16 17 18 19 20

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)