High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Land Acquisition Compensation Appeals. Claimants challenge the award of the Special Land Acquisition Officer for lands acquired for Karanjwan Dam under the Upper Godavari Project.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "Civic Amenities"
228 result(s) found
Found 228 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Flat Buyers Against Developer for Delayed Possession, Holds Unilateral Compensation Clause Unfair. Developer's stipulation of Rs 5 per sq ft per month as liquidated damages for delay held inadequate and unconscionable; flat buyers entitled to compensation at 6% per annum on amounts paid.
24 Aug 2020The case involves appeals by 171 flat buyers against the dismissal of their consumer complaint by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ...
- 274
High Court
High Court Dismisses Challenge to 5% Quota for Project Affected Persons in Agricultural University Recruitment. Court Upholds Government's Interpretation of Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999, Limiting Reservation to 5% Priority Quota Under Section 10(6)(a), Not 50% Under Section 6(c).
29 Oct 2015The matter involved two writ petitions filed by project affected persons whose lands were acquired for the establishment of Vasantrao Naik Marathwada ...
- 431
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes SRA Acquisition Notice for Church Land, Upholds Owner's Preferential Right to Redevelop Slum. The Court held that the owner of slum land has a preferential right to redevelop the land under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971, and the Slum Rehabilitation Authority cannot acquire the land for a private developer without considering the owner's proposal.
11 Jun 2024The petitioner, a public trust managing Mount Mary's Church in Bandra, Mumbai, owned land admeasuring 9371.30 sq. meters, out of which 1596.40 sq. met...
- 513
High Court
High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Recruitment Reservation Policy for Project Affected Persons Under Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999. Court Holds that Section 10(6)(a) Prescribes 5% Quota for PAPs, and Section 6(c) Ensures Priority Within That Quota, Not an Overall 50% Reservation.
29 Oct 2015The dispute arose from the acquisition of lands of the petitioners for the establishment of the Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Agricultural University at P...
- 403
High Court
High Court of Bombay Delivers Judgment in Writ Petition Challenging Revocation of Slaughter Licenses by Municipal Corporation; Questions of Arbitrariness and Natural Justice Violation Examined Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.
19 Dec 2019The Bombay Suburban Khatik Association, an association of butchers and mutton vendors, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution cha...
- 21
High Court
Bombay High Court Directs BEST Undertaking to Pay 30% of Retiral Dues to Ex-Employees, Recognizing Their Absolute Entitlement. Non-Payment Due to Financial Constraints of BEST Undertaking and Over-Dependence on MCGM and State Government Held Unacceptable.
30 Jun 2026This batch of writ petitions was filed by ex-employees of the Brihanmumbai Electricity Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST) seeking payment of unpa...
- 149
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Decides First Appeal No. 107 of 1999 and Cross Objection No. 6 of 2000 in Land Acquisition Compensation Case. The appeal challenged enhancement of compensation from Rs.4.50-6 to Rs.89.25 per square metre under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
18 Jul 2005The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard a first appeal and cross objection arising from a land acquisition reference under the Land Acquisition Act, 189...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition, Sets Aside Disqualification of Sarpanch. Teacher in Aided School Not a Government Servant Under Section 14(i) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958.
13 Jul 2011The petitioner, Shivaji Manohar Kale, was elected as a member and later as Sarpanch of Asegaon Gram Panchayat. Respondent No. 4 filed a complaint alle...
- 108
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Modifies Compensation Rate in Land Dispute Under Compromise Decree — Guideline Value Under Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 Fixed at Rs. 750 per Square Foot. Court Holds That Executing Court Erred in Applying Subsequent Notification and High Court's Reduction Was Unwarranted, Directs Payment of Average Guideline Value.
30 Apr 2026The case involves a dispute between Appellants (N.I.C.E.) and the decree holders, Respondents, arising from a compromise decree in a suit for permanen...
- 288
