Search Results for "CGST"

277 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 277 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging SVLDRS-3 Demand for Interest Component Under Sabka Vishwas Scheme. Interest paid under protest prior to show cause notice is part of tax dues under Section 124(2) of Finance Act, 2019.

The Petitioner, National Centre for the Performing Arts, a public trust registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, and engaged in providin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging CESTAT Order Rejecting Recall of Fraud Finding in CENVAT Credit Case. Court holds that CESTAT's finding of mis-statement and fraud was not a reviewable error and that the Tribunal had inherent power to impose costs for abuse of process.

The petitioner, Essel Propack Limited, a company engaged in manufacturing plastic tubes, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund Claim Under CGST Act Despite Previous Sanction for Overlapping Period. Second refund application for a specific month within a previously covered quarter is maintainable as the earlier sanction did not adjudicate the claim for that month.

The petitioner, Valmet Flow Control Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 3 April...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notices in Service Tax Case Due to Limitation and Lack of Jurisdiction. Multiple SCNs issued beyond normal period of limitation without proper justification under proviso to Section 73(1) of Finance Act, 1994 are invalid.

The petitioner, ATA Freight Line (I) Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in freight forwarding and logistics services, filed a writ petition under Article 22...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Section 498A IPC as Constitutionally Valid but Issues Guidelines to Prevent Misuse. The court held that the provision is not unconstitutional but requires safeguards against misuse through directions on arrest, investigation, and compounding of offences.

The Supreme Court in this batch of writ petitions and appeals considered the constitutional validity of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Withdrawal of Inter-Commissionerate Transfers for Inspectors Under Recruitment Rules 2016. Recruitment Rules Made Under Article 309 of the Constitution Prevail Over Executive Instructions, and ICTs Are Not Permissible as They Violate Separate Cadre Identity Under Rule 5.

The dispute arose from a batch of civil appeals filed by Inspectors of the Central Excise and Land Customs or Goods and Services Tax Administration, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944. Petitioner entitled to interest from expiry of three months from date of refund application till actual refund.

The petitioner, Qualcomm India Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, is engaged in providing support services to its ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Dismisses Customs Appeals Against Importers as Withdrawn. Commissioner of Customs Sought Permission to Withdraw Appeals Filed Under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 Against CESTAT Order, Which Was Granted.

The Commissioner of Customs, Tuticorin, filed two Civil Miscellaneous Appeals under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, before the Madurai Bench of ...