Search Results for "tribunal's jurisdiction"

8955 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8955 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State and Employee Petitions, Upholds Modification of Promotional Posting. Competent Authority Can Alter Posting Before Implementation Without Prior Hearing, No Vested Right to Place of Posting.

The case involves two writ petitions challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 30/07/2024 in Original Application No.600 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated Against Army Officer for Financial Irregularities. Court upholds Tribunal's refusal to quash proceedings, finding no violation of natural justice or mala fides.

The appellant, Brigadier L.I. Singh, was commissioned in the Indian Army in 1983 and served as Commander of 164 Mountain Brigade from December 2011 to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Against Tribunal Order Directing Posting and Salary to Suspended Police Officer. Held that non-posting without salary amounts to deemed suspension and violates principles of natural justice.

The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 18th August 2010 in Original App...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Seeking to Unilaterally Implement Notice of Change Under Section 9A of Industrial Disputes Act. Employer Cannot Implement Proposed Changes Without Settlement or Award from Competent Court.

The petitioner, J. D. Orgochem Limited (formerly Jaysynth Dyechem Ltd.), is a company engaged in manufacturing chemicals. The respondent, Dyes and Che...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows FERA Appeal: Tribunal Erred in Affirming Penalty for Alleged Contravention of Section 9(1)(f)(i) of FERA 1973 — Remittances Protected Under Remittances in Foreign Exchange (Immunities and Exemptions) Act, 1991 and Scheme of 1991.

The appellants, four individuals, received US$ 25,000 each in their savings bank accounts with Bank of Baroda on or about 12 October 1991, totaling US...