Search Results for "recovery after retirement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "recovery after retirement"

549 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 549 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Retired Railway Employee's Petition for Transfer of Quarters to Son. Transfer of Railway Quarters from Retiring Employee to Son is Not a Matter of Right but Subject to Administrative Policy and Availability.

17 Feb 2006

The petitioner, A.M. Attar, was a guard in the Central Railway who retired on 28 February 1997. He was allotted railway quarters at Byculla, Mumbai. H...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Deputy Registrars Challenging Recovery of Excess Salary Due to Mistaken Pay Rule Interpretation. Court holds that recovery of excess payments made without employee fault violates Article 300A of the Constitution and principles of equity.

10 Mar 2023

The petitioners, eight former and current Deputy Registrars of the Bombay High Court, filed a writ petition challenging the decision of the Registrar ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Municipal Pensioners Association Against Differential Pension Revision. Differential treatment of pre-2000 retirees violates Article 14; MCGM directed to revise pensions equally.

15 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Mumbai Municipal Pensioners Association, representing pensioners who retired from the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Municipal Pensioners Association Against Differential Pension Revision. Classification of Pensioners Based on Retirement Date Held Arbitrary Under Article 14.

15 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Mumbai Municipal Pensioners Association, representing pensioners who retired from the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity and Leave Encashment to Resigned Government Employees — Distinguishes Resignation from Voluntary Retirement Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and Maharashtra Civil Services Rules. Resignation after 10 years of service qualifies for gratuity under Section 4 of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, and Rule 66(3) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1981 is invalid for denying leave encashment on resignation.

20 Jun 2014

The Bombay High Court, in a group of three writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, considered the challenge by government emplo...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order and Remands for Fresh Inquiry in Sexual Harassment Dispute. The court held that imposing major penalty under Section 13(3)(i) of Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 requires separate inquiry under Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965, as applicable to IIT Bombay employees, beyond Internal Complaints Committee proceedings.

24 Mar 2026

The High Court of Bombay adjudicated a writ petition filed by a professor at IIT Bombay challenging his compulsory retirement order based on sexual ha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Retired Teacher for Pension as Trained Teacher - Petitioner's Appointment as Trained Teacher Approved and Confirmed, Entitled to Pension in Trained Scale

15 Jul 2013

The petitioner, Mrs. Charumathi Kannappa Mudaliar, was appointed as an Assistant Trained Teacher at respondent No.4 School, a recognized and aided sch...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Pay Revision Discrimination Case Against Maharashtra State Financial Corporation - Fixation of Cut-off Date for Fifth Pay Commission Benefits to Retired Employees Held Arbitrary Under Article 14 of the Constitution. The court ruled that denying benefits to employees who retired between 01.01.2006 and 29.03.2010, while granting retrospective benefits from 01.01.2006 to those in service on 29.03.2010, constitutes hostile discrimination as all formed a homogenous class during the revision period.

2 Feb 2023

The Supreme Court heard an appeal concerning the fixation of a cut-off date for implementing Fifth Pay Commission recommendations for employees of the...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Writ Petition Against Compulsory Retirement of Former Civil Judge; Alternative Remedy Not Exhausted But Court Proceeds to Hear Merits. Dispute concerns whether judicial officer's grant of bail in non-bailable offenses after rejection by Sessions Court and procedural irregularities under CrPC constitute misconduct warranting compulsory retirement.

26 Jul 2005

The petitioner, a former Joint Civil Judge (Junior Division) and Judicial Magistrate, filed a writ petition under Article 226 before the Bombay High C...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Directs Re-adjudication of 21 Employees' Claims; Dispute on Interest and Bonus Under Winding-Up Not Resolved in Extracted Judgment Text. The court granted partial relief by allowing prayer (b) for re-adjudication of claims of 21 workmen due to discrepancies, while the final decision on prayer (a) concerning statutory interest, bonus, and provident fund contribution under the Companies Act, 1956 is not discernible from the incomplete text.

4 Aug 2006

The case concerns a company application filed by the Engineering Workers Association, representing 121 employees of M/s. Poysha Industrial Co. Ltd., w...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)