Search Results for "non-application of mind"

443 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 443 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind to Bail Conditions. Failure to Consider Petitioner's Release on Bail in Criminal Case Rendered Detention Order Invalid.

The petitioner, Nasir Ismail Mujavar, challenged a detention order dated 3 February 2012 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, under the Mahar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Detaining Authority Failed to Independently Consider Grounds, Leading to Mechanical Affirmation of Proposal.

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Janardan @ Janyadada Chintaman Bhoir, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of RBI Employee for Non-Application of Mind. RBI's order set aside as review committee failed to consider petitioner's representation and relied on stale adverse remarks without assessing current performance.

The petitioner, Animesh Bakuli, was an employee of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) who was compulsorily retired from service by an order dated 13th Fe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Re-Assessment Orders in KVAT Act Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Reasons. Input Tax Credit Denial Based on Non-Availability of Selling Dealers at Registered Address Held Invalid Under Section 10(2) and Section 39 of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

The petitioner, M/s Onyx Designs, a proprietorship concern dealing in bags and gift items, was a registered dealer under the Karnataka Value Added Tax...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order for Vagueness and Non-Application of Mind Under Section 56(1) Bombay Police Act, 1951. The court held that the externment order was invalid as the notice did not specify the nature of harmful activities and the authority failed to consider less drastic remedies.

The petitioner, Shahid Mohammedali Bepari, challenged an externment order dated 11.4.2011 passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Miraj, under Sectio...