Search Results for "interruption"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "interruption"

210 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 210 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery of Excess Payment from Retired Municipal Employee — Upgradation Granted After 7 Years Service Cannot Be Revised Retrospectively Without Notice. Recovery of Rs.4,98,368/- from Retired Auxiliary Midwife Nurse Set Aside as Violative of Natural Justice and Employer's Mistake.

16 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Kalpana Chandrakant Gorhe, was appointed as an Auxiliary Midwife Nurse on 2 November 1992 with the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Holding That Defendant No. 2 Failed to Establish Adverse Possession Over Suit Property. The Court Set Aside Concurrent Findings of Lower Courts and Remanded the Matter for Fresh Consideration on the Issue of Adverse Possession.

24 Nov 2016

The case involves a second appeal arising from a partition suit filed by the plaintiff (Sitaram) against defendants no. 1 (Pandharinath) and no. 2 (Pa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Suit for Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off Against Defendants Over 'SUNCONTROL' Mark. The Court held that 'SUNCONTROL' is descriptive and not distinctive, and that the plaintiff failed to establish secondary meaning or likelihood of confusion.

12 Jul 2016

The plaintiff, Garware Polyester Limited, filed a suit for trade mark infringement and passing off against 3M Company and 3M India Limited, alleging t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds IPAB Order Expunging Trademark 'Creative' for Deceptive Similarity in Travel Services. Petitioner's mark 'Creative Tours & Travels' held deceptively similar to respondent's registered mark 'Creative Travel', causing confusion among consumers under Section 9(2)(a) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

4 May 2016

The petitioner, Creative Tours & Travels (India) Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Grounds of Patent Illegality and Public Policy. Court sets aside award for ignoring contractual terms and failing to consider counterclaims.

29 Oct 2015

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions arising out of the same arbitral award. The petitioners (original respondents) challenged the award un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Retired KVIC Employee Challenging Withdrawal of Pension and Recovery of Paid Pension. Pension is a Right, Not a Bounty, and Cannot Be Withdrawn Without Statutory Authority Under Regulation 15 of KVIC Employees Pension Regulations 1984.

8 Sep 2015

The petitioner, A.K. Kumaran Nair, joined the U.P. Khadi and Village Industries Board on 15 June 1982. The Board was taken over by the Khadi and Villa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Employees' Union Against EPFO for Treating Provident Fund Account as Inoperative and Denying Interest. The court held that when an establishment is transferred as a going concern and employees continue in service, the provident fund account cannot be treated as inoperative under Paragraph 72(1) of the Employees' Provident Fund Scheme, 1952.

10 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Johnson & Johnson Employees' Union, a registered trade union, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India see...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging BCCI's Amendment Excluding IPL and CLT20 from Conflict of Interest Regulations. The court held that the amendment was a valid policy decision by a private body and not subject to judicial review unless it violates statutory provisions or fundamental rights.

11 Nov 2014

The petitioner, Cricket Association of Bihar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the amendment to Regulation 6.2.4 of the BCCI Regul...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Order on Pecuniary Jurisdiction — Suit Valuation Determined by Relief Sought in Plaint. The court held that the trial court erred in relying on the defendant's valuation of the suit property to oust its pecuniary jurisdiction, as the valuation for jurisdiction must be based on the relief claimed in the plaint under Section 6 of the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959.

10 Sep 2014

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed Regular Civil Suit No.124 of 2013 before the 4th Joint Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.), Akola, seeking a declaration...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court held that no substantial question of law arose for consideration under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a second appeal filed by the appellants against the judgment and decree of the first appellate court which confirmed the trial court...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)