KAHC010102062008_1
10 Aug 2018...
Search Results for "district consumer commission"
440 result(s) found
Found 440 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Cooperative Court Order in Housing Society Dispute — Upholds Jurisdiction of Cooperative Court Under Section 91 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 for Disputes Between Members and Society Regarding Common Areas and Facilities.
30 Nov -0001The petitioners, M/s Amerkar Construction and Sons and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging an order passed b...
- 151
High Court
High Court of Bombay Issues Rule and Hears Matter Finally in Writ Petition Challenging MSEDCL Communication. The Court Decides the Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution with Consent of Parties After Respondents Waive Service.
6 Jun 2025The petitioners, a private limited company and its shareholder, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High C...
- 21
High Court
Gujarat High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging National Commission Order in Medical Insurance Claim Dispute. Policy Exclusion Clause for Pre-Existing Disease Upheld as Complainant Failed to Disclose Medical History.
11 Feb 2026The petitioner, Gunvantbhai Bhogilal Shah, along with his wife, availed a Group Medical Insurance Scheme from United India Insurance Co. Ltd. (respond...
- 160
High Court
- 148
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Distribution Company's Appeal in Electricity Act Case Over Tariff Dispute. The Court upheld the Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission's order altering the tariff for inadvertent drawal from temporary to regular supply under open access regulations, affirming regulatory authority under Sections 42 and 181 of the Electricity Act, 2003.
17 Feb 2022The appeal was filed under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003 by Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (AVVNL), a distribution company, challenging ...
- 222
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in Real Estate Regulation Case, Upholding Authority's Jurisdiction and Pre-deposit Condition. The court affirmed that a single member of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority has jurisdiction to order refunds under Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, and the pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) is valid for statutory appeals.
11 Nov 2021The dispute arose from appeals filed by promoters and real estate developers against orders of the High Court of Allahabad, which had dismissed their ...
- 230
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Creditor's Application for Secured Creditor Status in Liquidation; Cooperative Bank's Claim Based on Unregistered Mortgage and Recovery Certificate Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. A Recovery Certificate ordering attachment and sale does not create a charge on company assets without registration under Section 125 of the Companies Act, 1956, and an unregistered mortgage is void against the Official Liquidator.
3 Jun 2019This matter arose in the winding up of Satwik Electric Controls Private Limited (the Company), ordered to be wound up on 19 July 2007. City Coop Credi...
- 56
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Challenge to MahaRERA Adjudicating Officer Order in Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 Matter. Petition Filed Under Article 226 Seeking Quashing of Compensation Order on Ground of RERA Registration Exemption for Part Occupancy Certificate Phase.
1 Mar 2021The matter concerned a challenge under Article 226 of the Constitution to an order of the Adjudicating Officer, Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Aut...
- 18
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging RTI Disclosure of Contractual Information Between Private Companies and Government. Information Sought Relates to Public Activity and Falls Under Section 2(h) of RTI Act as 'Public Authority'.
30 Nov -0001The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by M/s Shonkh Technology International Ltd. and M/s United Telecom Limited challenging orders of the St...
- 109
