Search Results for "directory rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "directory rules"

556 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 556 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Section 9A of Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act Requiring Caste Validity Certificate for Councillors. Provision Held Valid as It Is a Reasonable Classification to Prevent Fraud on Reservation and Does Not Violate Articles 14 and 243T.

18 Oct 2019

The petitioners, elected councillors of Jalna Municipal Council from reserved categories, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 9A of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund Claim Despite Non-Electronic Filing in GST Case — Circular Cannot Override Statutory Provisions. Refund application filed manually under Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017 held valid as Circular No. 125/44/2019-GST requiring electronic filing is directory, not mandatory.

14 Feb 2022

The petitioners, C.P. Ravindranath Menon and Sindhu Ravindranath Menon, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Assessment Order in Transfer Pricing Case for Violation of Natural Justice — Failure to Provide Show-Cause Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Renders Order Invalid. Petitioner's Objections to Draft Assessment Order Not Considered, Violating Section 144C of Income Tax Act, 1961.

28 Jul 2021

The petitioner, SHL (India) Private Limited, an Indian company and part of the SHL Group, United Kingdom, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Direction to Provide Arbitration in Expired Toll Collection Contracts. Clause 36 of Agreement Held Not an Arbitration Agreement; Court Cannot Direct Parties to Arbitrate Under Article 226.

6 Nov 2020

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by M/s. MEP RGSL Toll Bridge Pvt. Ltd. and Raima Toll & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., both specia...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Examines Constitutional Validity of Amendment to CPC Fixing 120-Day Limit for Written Statement; Challenge to Provisions Curtailing Judicial Discretion and Inherent Powers. The Amendment, Introduced by State Legislature, Allegedly Overrides Supreme Court Ruling and Violates Articles 14 and 141 of the Constitution.

28 Jul 2026

The High Court of Karnataka entertained two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging the constitutional validi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch for Violation of Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Bombay Village Panchayats (Meeting) Rules, 1959. No-confidence motion invalid as three-day notice not given to Sarpanch and motion not properly moved for voting.

22 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Nirmala w/o Pandharinath Sarde (Shiralkar), was the Sarpanch of Shirala Village Panchayat. On 22.12.2023, an extraordinary meeting was...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Quashing of Dismissal Order in Police Departmental Inquiry Case; Non-compliance with Punjab Police Rules, 1934, Rule 16.38 Sanction Requirement Vitiates Inquiry. The Court found that the inquiry officer failed to properly obtain sanction of the District Magistrate as mandated by sub-rules (1) and (2) of Rule 16.38, rendering the subsequent departmental inquiry and dismissal order invalid.

12 Feb 1969

The case concerned a service matter arising from the dismissal of an Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police (the respondent) after a departmental inquiry. ...

High Court

COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 371 OF 2019

11 Dec 2019

...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Promotion Claim Due to Non-Communication of APARs — IRCTC Promotion Policy Benchmark Quashed as Arbitrary. The court held that non-communication of Annual Performance Appraisal Reports before using them to deny promotion violates principles of natural justice, and directed reconsideration of promotion without considering uncommunicated APARs.

5 Jan 2026

The petitioner, Susheel Patil, an employee of Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd (IRCTC), filed a petition under Articles 14, 16 and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Held that the Trial Court Erred in Dismissing Suit for Non-Prosecution Without Considering Merits and That the Suit Was Not Abated Despite Death of Sole Proprietor as Legal Representatives Were Brought on Record.

30 Nov -0001

The present appeal arises from a suit filed in 1983 by the original plaintiffs (respondents herein) against the original defendant, Bitesh Hanumantrao...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)