Search Results for "different establishments"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "different establishments"

681 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 681 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Whether Petitioner is Entitled to Refund of Unutilized Input Tax Credit Under GST Laws. The Court Examines Whether the Petitioner Company Supplying Services to Foreign Group Companies Qualifies as an 'Agent' Under Section 2(5) of CGST Act.

16 Jun 2025

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged two Orders-in-Appeal dated 10.08.2023 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of...

High Court

High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Company and Contractors Under Contract Labour Act for Lack of Sanction — Prosecution Without Prior Sanction Under Section 34 of CLRA Act is Barred by Law.

26 Aug 2021

The petitioners, M/s. Kurlon Enterprise Limited (Foam Unit) and two individuals (Sri. Thimmarayappa and Sri. Y.R. Muraju), filed writ petitions under ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition by SSLC-Qualified Individual Seeking Registration as Medical Practitioner Under Karnataka Private Medical Establishments Act, 2007 — Use of 'Dr.' Prefix Without Recognized Medical Qualification Held Illegal. The court held that a person with only SSLC qualification cannot call himself 'Dr.' or practice medicine, and registration under the Act requires a recognized medical qualification.

17 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Dr. A.A. Muralidharswamy, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karna...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Industrial Court Orders in Labour Dispute — Upholds Interim Relief Granted to Union Under Section 30(2) of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court Has Jurisdiction to Grant Interim Relief Without First Deciding Maintainability of Complaint.

19 Oct 2015

The case involves four writ petitions filed by industrial companies (M/s Saklecha Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd., M/s Sudesh Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd., M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Extension of Justice Shetty Commission Benefits to Family Court Staff. The court held that staff of Family Courts at Aurangabad and Nagpur are entitled to the same benefits as staff in other districts under the Family Courts Act, 1984.

14 Aug 2014

The petitioners, who were staff members of the Family Courts at Aurangabad and Nagpur, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows ESI Corporation's Appeal Against Insurance Court Order Setting Aside Coverage of Establishment Under ESI Act. The Court Held That the Insurance Court Erred in Holding That the Corporation's Order Under Section 45A Was Without Jurisdiction, as the Respondent Had Been Given Sufficient Opportunity and the Notification Under Section 1(5) Was Valid.

29 Jan 2014

The appeal was filed by the Employees State Insurance Corporation (appellant) under Section 82 of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 (ESI Act) ag...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Gratuity Order Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy Under Section 7(7) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 cannot be invoked when statutory appeal remedy is available and not exhausted.

27 Nov 2013

The petitioner, Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad, Beed, challenged the order dated 23/08/2011 passed by the Assistant Labour Commissioner and...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in ESI Act Case — Employer Not Liable for Contribution on Wages Paid During Strike Period. Security services company successfully challenges ESI Corporation's demand for contribution on wages paid to employees during a strike, as such wages are not 'remuneration' under Section 2(22) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948.

21 Nov 2023

The appellant, M/s Group 4 Securitas Guarding Limited (now G4S Security Secure Solutions India (P) Ltd), is a security services company covered under ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows SAIL's Appeal in Minimum Wages Case: Contract Labour Not Entitled to Parity with Regular Employees Without Pleading and Proof of Same Work. Claim under Minimum Wages Act, 1948 for wages at par with regular employees fails as contract labour did not establish performing same or similar nature of work.

5 Jul 2019

The present appeals arise from proceedings initiated by workers under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, who were employed after the issuance of a prohibiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaints for Dishonour of Cheques Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court held that the complainant must prove that the demand notice was sent to the correct address of the accused by registered post with acknowledgment due, failing which the complaint is not maintainable.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves a batch of criminal writ petitions filed by the petitioners (Prabhakar Dattatraya Gune, Sanjay Chandrakant Kirloskar, and M.V. P...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)