KAHC010059832012_1
21 Jun 2016The available text of the judgment only includes the list of parties in W.P.No.27674/2012 and connected cases, filed as a Public Interest Litigation b...
Search Results for "declaration under Section 126"
764 result(s) found
Found 764 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Default Bail Application Filed Under Section 482 CrPC by Accused in UAPA Case, Holding Extension of Detention and Cognizance by Non-Special Judge Void. Unlawful Extension of Detention Under Section 43-D(2) UAPA and Cognizance by Judge Not Designated Under NIA Act Rendered Proceedings Without Jurisdiction.
1 Dec 2021The matter arose from an FIR initially registered with Vishrambaug Police Station in connection with the Elgar Parishad programme held on 31st Decembe...
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Decides Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications. Petitions Seek to Quash Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout by BDA.
11 Jul 2014A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the preliminary notification dated 21.05....
- 53
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Resolves Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for 'Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout'. The Petitioners Sought to Quash Preliminary Notification Dated 21.05.2008 and Final Notification Dated 18.02.2010 Issued by Bangalore Development Authority.
11 Jul 2014A large batch of writ petitions came before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. T...
- 73
High Court
- 45
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.
13 Nov 2024The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...
- 929
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions on Lapse of Acquisition Under KIAD Act Due to Non-Passing of Award. Petitioners, Subsequent Purchasers, Argue Absence of Statutory Time Limit Does Not Allow Indefinite Delay, While Respondents Contend Delay Caused by Petitioners' Own Litigation and Interim Orders.
7 Mar 2019The writ petitioners, subsequent purchasers of lands measuring 16 acres 4.25 guntas in Amani Bellandur Khane Village, challenged the acquisition proce...
- 32
High Court
Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Acquisition Proceedings Under KIAD Act Due to Non-Passing of Award Within Reasonable Time. The Petitioners Contend that the Acquisition for BWSSB Sewerage Treatment Plant is Unenforceable as No Award was Passed Despite a Decade-Long Litigation.
7 Mar 2019The case pertains to writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru by M...
- 38
High Court
- 120
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission’s Distribution Open Access Regulations. Challenge Concerns Alleged Jurisdictional Overreach Curtailing Consumers’ Right to Access Power Exchange Under the Electricity Act, 2003.
30 Oct 2015The provided text is an incomplete extract of a judgment from the Bombay High Court in a set of writ petitions (WP Nos. 2694/2014, 2318/2014, 2294/201...
- 32
