APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.495 OF 2015
8 Mar 2016The judgment under consideration pertains to four appeals arising from a property dispute involving final plot no.267 of Town Planning Scheme IV, Mahi...
Search Results for "civil suit stay"
2764 result(s) found
Found 2764 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Stay on Personal Guarantee Enforcement in CDR Failure Case — Deed of Guarantee Held Not Enforceable Due to Conditional Nature and Subsequent Termination Events. The court found that the guarantee was conditional upon CDR sanction and automatically terminated upon CDR failure and the guarantor's resignation, making it unenforceable against the personal guarantor.
14 Dec 2024The Plaintiff, Deepen Arun Parekh, filed a suit seeking a declaration that the Deed of Guarantee dated 10 April 2014 executed by him in favour of the ...
- 388
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Trust Dispute Over Meeting Validity — Rejection of Plaint Upheld as Suit Barred by Section 80 of Maharashtra Public Trusts Act. The court held that civil court lacks jurisdiction to entertain disputes relating to internal management of public trusts, and the proper remedy lies before the Charity Commissioner under the Act.
5 Aug 2016The case involves a dispute concerning the internal management of Pune Vidyarthi Griha, a society registered under the Maharashtra Public Charitable T...
- 132
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition for Interim Relief in Family Settlement Dispute. Court grants status quo order to protect assets pending arbitration under family settlement agreement.
22 Dec 2018The petitioner, Mukesh J. Shah, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim relief pe...
- 55
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Execution Petition as Time-Barred in Specific Performance Case. Dismissal of Appeal for Want of Prosecution Does Not Constitute Merger of Decree and Limitation Period Runs from Date of Trial Court Decree Absent Stay of Execution.
9 Jun 2025The dispute arose from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural land. The predecessor of the petitioners (plaintiff) had e...
- 27
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Suit for Declaration of Title and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Ownership and Possession Over Suit Property.
26 Sep 2024The case involves two regular second appeals filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the judgment and decree dated ...
- 104
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Suit for Recovery of Business Premises — Conducting Agreement Not Proved as License; Relationship of Licensor-Licensee Not Established. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove the conducting agreement and the defendant's possession was adverse, barring the suit by limitation.
19 May 2020The appellants (original defendants) challenged the judgment and decree dated 20th March 2007 passed by the Bombay City Civil Court, which decreed the...
- 89
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision Against Eviction Decree in Rent Control Case — Non-User and Bonafide Requirement Established. Tenant failed to occupy suit premises for over six months and landlord proved reasonable bonafide requirement for residence of his son under Sections 16(1)(n) and 16(1)(g) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
15 Jun 2017The present Civil Revision Application was filed by the tenant (applicant) under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the con...
- 98
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Specific Performance — Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Execution and Attestation Were Not Established. The Court Held That the Plaintiff Failed to Discharge the Burden of Proof Under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 and Section 68 of the Evidence Act, 1872.
30 Nov -0001The petitioner, Jayprakash Sitaram Goel, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 1st May 1995 and for permanent injunction...
- 85
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Injunction Case — Trial Court Erred in Dismissing Injunction Applications Without Considering Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience. Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC — Court Held That Plaintiff's Possession and Title Must Be Protected Pending Suit.
19 Jan 2024The appellant, Smt. Jagadishwari, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the o...
- 250
