Search Results for "State Brief"

7672 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7672 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Mandatory Video Recording of Court Proceedings; Court Finds No Fundamental Right to Such Recording and Leaves Policy Decision to High Court Administration.

The Bombay High Court heard two petitions together: a writ petition by Sunil Shantisarup Gupta and a criminal application by Indur Kartar Chhugani, bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010085932008_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench Adjudicates Challenge to Declaration of Chandrapur as Dry District Under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. Order Dated 05.03.2015 and Section 139(1)(a) of the Act Challenged as Violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

This batch of writ petitions challenged the declaration of Chandrapur as a dry district. The petitioners, holders of licenses under the Maharashtra Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs State and Municipal Corporation to Remove Unauthorized Religious Structures in Public Interest Litigation. Illegal Shrines Built After Supreme Court Cutoff Date Must Be Demolished Without Delay, and Older Structures Must Be Categorized for Regularization, Relocation, or Removal.

The Public Interest Litigation was filed by Society for Fast Justice and another petitioner highlighting the failure of the State of Maharashtra and t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Three Writ Petitions Challenging Government Orders and Lokayukta Charge Memoes in Basava Vasati Housing Scheme Scam Case. Court Examines Legality of Disciplinary Proceedings Under Karnataka Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1957 and Lokayukta Act, 1984.

Three writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Karnataka by retired engineers of Karnataka Rural Infrastructure Development Limited (KRIDL),...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Directs Shifting of Date for Determining Market Value Due to Inordinate Delay. Compensation to be Determined as on Date of Award Instead of Preliminary Notification Under Section 28 of KIAD Act, 1966.

The appellants, Bernard Francis Joseph Vaz and others, purchased residential sites in Gottigere Village, Bengaluru between 1995 and 1997. On 3rd April...