Search Results for "Slum Areas Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Slum Areas Act"

230 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 230 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Promoter's Appeal in RERA Interest Dispute — Interest on Delayed Possession to Run from 1 July 2016, Not 1 January 2020, But COVID Period Excluded from Interest Liability. The court held that the promoter is liable to pay interest from the date of default as per the agreement, but the COVID-19 pandemic period is excluded from interest liability.

23 Jan 2024

The case involves two appeals filed by M/s. Pragatej Builders And Developers Pvt. Ltd. (the promoter) against a common judgment and order dated 7 Febr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MHADA Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute. Court upholds MHADA's order directing petitioners to vacate and hand over possession of chawl rooms for redevelopment under Section 95A of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976.

23 Oct 2023

The petitioners, who are residents of Mohamed Tajbhai Chawl in Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Eviction Orders in SRA Rehabilitation Scheme — Petitioner Failed to Prove Eligibility as Original Tenant or Purchaser of Alternate Room. Concurrent Findings of Fact by Deputy Collector and Apex Grievance Redressal Committee Upheld as Not Perverse.

9 Jun 2023

The Petitioner, Prakash Bandu Jadyal, filed two writ petitions challenging orders dated 15.03.2021 passed by Respondent No.2 (Deputy Collector, Mumbai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Aarey Colony Development as Forest Land — Held That Aarey Colony Is Not a Forest Under the Forest Conservation Act, 1980, and That the State Government Has Discretion to Use Land for Public Purposes. The court ruled that the dictionary meaning of 'forest' does not apply to Aarey Colony, and the petitioners failed to establish that it is a forest requiring prior approval under Section 2 of the Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

4 Oct 2019

The petitioners, Vanashakti (a public trust) and four individuals, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Orders Demolition of Illegal Coastal Construction in Public Interest Litigation — Violation of CRZ Regulations and MRTP Act Established. The court found that the construction was carried out without permission and directed demolition within eight weeks.

1 Nov 2018

The Bombay High Court, in a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Bombay Environmental Action Group and another, addressed the issue of illegal cons...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Maharashtra Fire Prevention Act, 2006 as Constitutionally Valid. Levy of fire prevention fee under Section 12 is a fee, not a tax, and the Act is within legislative competence.

5 Dec 2015

The petitioners, Vidarbha Taxpayers Association and a citizen, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of the Mahar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging TDR Loading and FSI Computation for Redevelopment Project. Court upholds MCGM's permission for TDR and fungible FSI, finding no illegality or public interest violation.

30 Sep 2014

The petitioner, Nitesh Mohanlal Doshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the permission gr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Restrains Flour Mill in Slum Area on Nuisance Grounds — Interim Injunction Upheld Pending Suit. The court held that the trial court's finding of prima facie nuisance and balance of convenience in favor of the plaintiffs was not perverse or erroneous.

12 Apr 2005

The appeal arose from a suit filed by the original plaintiffs (respondents 3 to 10) who were residents of a slum near V.P. Stadium, Worli, Mumbai. The...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Executor's Petition for Enhanced Compensation in Town Planning Scheme — Claim Barred by Limitation and Res Judicata. Compensation for garden reservation under TPS V Santacruz was determined by arbitrator and Tribunal of Appeal; subsequent claim under Section 84 of MRTP Act, 1966 held time-barred and not maintainable.

17 Mar 2005

The petitioner, Lakhmichand Ramchand Asrani, as executor of the will of his father Ramchand Daulatram Asrani, filed a writ petition seeking a directio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Orders Against Petitioners in Maharashtra Police Act Case — Orders Set Aside for Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Lack of Material. Externment Orders Under Section 56 of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 Quashed as Based on Vague Allegations and Without Proper Hearing.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, eleven individuals from Karad and Sangli, challenged externment orders passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Pune, under Section 56 ...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)