Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Orders Against Petitioners in Maharashtra Police Act Case — Orders Set Aside for Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Lack of Material. Externment Orders Under Section 56 of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 Quashed as Based on Vague Allegations and Without Proper Hearing.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, eleven individuals from Karad and Sangli, challenged externment orders passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Pune, under Section 56 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. The orders directed them to remove themselves from the limits of Satara and Sangli districts for a period of two years. The petitioners contended that the orders were passed without proper application of mind, based on vague and stale incidents, and in violation of principles of natural justice. The court examined the show-cause notices and the material on record, finding that the notices did not specify the precise nature of the alleged activities and that the externment authority had merely relied on police reports without independent verification. The court held that externment is a drastic measure affecting personal liberty and must be based on subjective satisfaction derived from credible material. Since the orders were founded on vague allegations and lacked proper hearing, they were quashed. The court allowed the petitions and set aside the externment orders.

Headnote

A) Maharashtra Police Act - Externment - Section 56 - Principles of Natural Justice - Externment orders quashed as they were passed without giving adequate opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and were based on vague and stale incidents - Held that the authority must record subjective satisfaction based on credible material and not merely on police reports (Paras 10-15).

B) Maharashtra Police Act - Externment - Section 56 - Vague Allegations - Externment orders set aside where the notices did not specify the precise nature of the alleged activities and the material relied upon was insufficient - Held that externment cannot be ordered on the basis of general and unspecific allegations (Paras 16-20).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the externment orders passed under Section 56 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 are sustainable when they are based on vague allegations and without proper application of mind.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petitions and quashed the externment orders passed against the petitioners.

Law Points

  • Principles of natural justice
  • Externment under Maharashtra Police Act
  • Requirement of subjective satisfaction
  • Right to be heard
  • Proportionality
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (07) 86

Criminal Writ Petition No.2454 of 2018 and Criminal Writ Petition No.275 of 2018

0000-00-00

Shri Altaf Rajekhan Pathan and others

The Divisional Commissioner, Pune and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petitions challenging externment orders passed under Section 56 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of externment orders and setting aside of the directions to remove from district limits.

Filing Reason

The petitioners were served with externment orders based on vague and stale allegations without proper hearing.

Previous Decisions

The Divisional Commissioner, Pune passed externment orders against the petitioners.

Issues

Whether the externment orders under Section 56 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 are sustainable when based on vague allegations and without proper application of mind. Whether the principles of natural justice were violated in the externment proceedings.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioners argued that the externment orders were passed without proper application of mind and based on vague and stale incidents. The respondents contended that the orders were passed after following due procedure and based on material on record.

Ratio Decidendi

Externment orders under Section 56 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 must be based on subjective satisfaction derived from credible and specific material, and not on vague allegations or stale incidents. The authority must provide adequate opportunity of hearing to the affected person.

Judgment Excerpts

The externment orders are quashed as they were passed without giving adequate opportunity of hearing and were based on vague and stale incidents. The authority must record subjective satisfaction based on credible material and not merely on police reports.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed criminal writ petitions before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging the externment orders passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Pune.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Police Act, 1951: 56
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Orders Against Petitioners in Maharashtra Police Act Case — Orders Set Aside for Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Lack of Material. Externment Orders Under Section 56 of Maharashtra Police Act, 195...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Cooperative Housing Society's Petition for Mandamus to Demolish Staircase for Fire Access. Court holds that the Society failed to establish any legal right or breach of statutory duty by MMRDA or other authorities regardin...