WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2317 OF 2019
19 Dec 2019...
Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966"
678 result(s) found
Found 678 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Construction on Public Trust Land. Held that the Municipal Corporation's action under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 was valid as the construction was on public property and no prior notice was required for demolition of unauthorized structures on public land.
20 Mar 2019The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the demolition of structures by the Municipal Corporation of Great...
- 95
High Court
Bombay High Court Directs Freeze on Mangrove Destruction in Maharashtra and Orders Comprehensive Satellite Mapping to Identify Protection Areas. High Court Recognizes Ecological Importance of Mangroves and Applies Precautionary Principle to Prevent Further Damage Pending Final Adjudication.
17 Sep 2018The Public Interest Litigation was filed by Bombay Environmental Action Group and another before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, seeking prote...
- 42
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Reservation for Sports Complex in Development Plan. Court upholds reservation of land for a multipurpose sports complex under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, rejecting claims of non-implementation and lack of public purpose.
6 Feb 2020The Bharatiya Adhyatmic Society, a public charitable trust, owned land in Chembur, Mumbai. The land was reserved for a 'Chembur Multipurpose Complex' ...
- 57
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Enforcement of SDM's Order on Removal of Unauthorised Parking and Encroachments. Directs Authorities to Implement Order and Frame Guidelines to Ensure Free Traffic Movement Under Motor Vehicles Act and Municipal Laws.
7 Jun 2006The petitioners, residents of Chandrapur, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to ...
- 35
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Minister's Revision Order in Land Record Dispute — Restoration of Revenue Entries Directed. The Court held that the Minister exceeded jurisdiction under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 by entertaining a revision against an order that had attained finality.
22 Apr 2026The petitioner, Rama s/o Gunda Malkapure, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an order dated 06.06.2017 ...
- 471
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MHADA NOC for Reconstruction — Neighboring Society Failed to Prove Fraud or Infringement of Rights. NOC under DCR 33(7) for reconstruction of cessed building was valid as FSI of 2.5 did not depend on number of tenements and allegations of bogus tenancies were disputed questions of fact not suitable for writ jurisdiction.
28 Jun 2006The dispute arose from a writ petition under Article 226 filed by a neighbouring cooperative housing society and its member challenging a No Objection...
- 18
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment Project in Colaba, Quashes Stop Work Notice Issued by MCGM Based on Defence Authority's Letter. NOC from Defence Authorities Not Required for Completion of Construction Under DCR 1991 as Height Restriction Under Works of Defence Act, 1903 Not Applicable to Building Height Below 30 Meters.
27 Feb 2019The petitioner, Sea Kunal Corporation Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company, undertook redevelopment under the Development Control Regulations of 1991 ...
- 144
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Public Parking Lot and FSI Computation in Mumbai Building Project. The Court held that construction of public parking lot above plinth level without valid commencement certificate was illegal, and remanded FSI computation issues for fresh consideration.
24 Oct 2019The case involves a dispute over the construction of a residential building and a public parking lot (PPL) by Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Ltd. (SRU...
- 227
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Premium on Staircase and Lift Areas Under D.C. Regulations — Levy at Revised Land Rate Upheld. The court held that the Municipal Corporation can charge premium for exempted FSI areas at the prevailing land rate, and the petitioners have no vested right to the earlier rate.
10 Jun 2010The petitioners, M/s. Buildarch and its partner, owned a property at Prabhadevi, Mumbai, and sought to redevelop it. They submitted plans and paid var...
- 87
