Search Results for "Excise Commissioner"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Excise Commissioner"

1601 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1601 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Customs Case — Conversion of DEEC Shipping Bill to Drawback Scheme Denied. CBEC Circular No. 4/2004 Mandates Prior Denial of DEEC Benefit by DGFT or Customs Authorities, Which Was Not Established.

5 Jan 2016

The appellant, Manawat Plastics Pvt. Ltd., exported Woven PP Bags/Fabrics under three Shipping Bills dated 06.08.2002, 13.08.2002, and 16.09.2002 unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Classification Dispute — Interest Under Section 11AA Not Payable When Goods Cleared Under Provisional Assessment. Court holds that interest under Section 11AA of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is not attracted when goods are cleared pending finalisation of classification list, as the assessment is provisional.

20 Mar 2012

The appellant-assessee, originally known as Morris Electronics Ltd., was engaged in the manufacture of soft ferrite components. It filed a classificat...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows CENVAT Credit on Mobile Towers and Prefabricated Buildings for Mobile Service Providers — Interprets 'Capital Goods' and 'Inputs' Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Mobile towers and PFBs are essential for providing telecom services and qualify as capital goods or inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

22 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a batch of appeals concerning the eligibility of mobile service providers (MSPs) to claim CENVAT credit on exci...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Penalty Under Excise Rules for Short-Lifting of Liquor. The court heard arguments on additional grounds after noting that the issue was covered by a previous order in Lakshmi Bar and Restaurant Case.

18 Aug 2017

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of connected writ petitions filed by several CL-9 licence holders, including M/s. High Point Hotels Pvt. Ltd...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Condonation of Delay Beyond Statutory Limit in Central Excise Appeal. Section 35 of Central Excise Act, 1944 Provides an Outer Limit of 30 Days for Condonation, Which Cannot Be Extended by Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

15 Mar 2012

The petitioner, M/s Raj Chemicals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Court seeking a direction to con...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Rebate Claim as Time-Barred Under Section 11B of Central Excise Act — Export Date Determines Limitation Period, Filing of ARE-1 Not a Substitute for Rebate Claim.

29 Mar 2012

The petitioner, Everest Flavours Ltd., exported a consignment of 360 drums containing Menthol Crystals to Bangkok on 12 February 2006. The shipping bi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Classification Dispute — Interest Not Payable Without Specific Provision. Held that Section 11AA of Central Excise Act, 1944 does not apply to Additional Duties under ADE (T&TA) Act, 1978, and interest cannot be levied in absence of charging provision.

17 Jul 2017

The appellant, Indo Swiss Embroidery Industries Limited, is engaged in manufacturing embroidered grey fabrics classified under Chapter Sub Heading 580...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Validity of Distance Restriction for Liquor Shops in Excise Rules — Rule 3(11-C) of Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquors) Rules, 1968 Held Intra Vires. Court dismisses petitions challenging 100-meter distance from highways as reasonable and not violative of fundamental rights.

15 Jun 2021

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by various liquor licensees and applicants challenging the validity of Rule 3(11-C) of the Karna...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against CESTAT Pre-Deposit Order in CENVAT Credit Case — Prima Facie Case for Waiver of Pre-Deposit Established. The Court held that the appellant had made out a strong prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as the statements relied upon were retracted and no opportunity for cross-examination was given.

8 May 2015

The appellant, Ms. Arjandas Metal Industries Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against an order dated 10th ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Denial of Denatured Spirit License for Industrial Use. Held that rectified spirit/denatured spirit is not 'intoxicating liquor' under the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 and that the State cannot refuse license for industrial use under the Bombay Denatured Spirit, Methyl Alcohol and Varnish (Miscellaneous) Rules, 1954.

27 Feb 2017

The petitioners, M/s. Biostar Pharmaceuticals Limited and Mr. Ashok Bora, filed two writ petitions challenging the refusal of the State Excise authori...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)