INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 25700 OF 2025
9 Oct 2025...
Search Results for "Copyright Registration"
174 result(s) found
Found 174 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice. Service of notice under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 must be proved by actual delivery or proper postal endorsement; mere dispatch is insufficient.
4 Feb 2010The petitioner, Ananda Rao Kanthamaneni, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Co...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Heard Appeal in Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 on Joint Liability of Husband for Wife's Share Trading Debit Balance. The court examined whether separate client accounts under Regulation 247A of the Bombay Stock Exchange Bye-laws precluded the broker from claiming joint and several liability against the appellant for the debit balance of his wife's separate trading account absent a tripartite agreement.
29 Apr 2021The dispute arose out of a share trading relationship between a stock broker and two of its constituents, who were husband and wife, each maintaining ...
- 11
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Seeking SIT Investigation in Cyber Crime Case — No Grounds Made Out for Transfer of Investigation to Special Investigation Team. The court held that the power to order an SIT investigation is extraordinary and must be exercised sparingly; mere allegations of inadequate investigation do not warrant transfer.
25 Apr 2025The petitioner, Newspace Research and Technologies Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013, filed a writ petition under ...
- 67
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Refers Question of Law on Allowability of Expenditure under Section 40(a)(i) and Section 172 of Income Tax Act to Larger Bench. Disagreement with earlier Division Bench decision in CIT v. Orient (Goa) Pvt. Ltd. leads to referral on whether payer's non-resident status required for invoking proviso to Section 172.
5 Feb 2016Background: The case concerns income tax appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income ...
- 51
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Prohibition Against Commercial Court in Arbitration Matter. Commercial Court's Jurisdiction Upheld Under Section 2(1)(c) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and Petitioner Estopped from Challenging Jurisdiction After Having Earlier Invoked It.
2 Jun 2023The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of prohibition to restrain the LXXXV Additional City Civil a...
- 30
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Examines Vires of Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 Amidst Concerns Over Judicial Independence. Petitioners Argue That Provisions on Appointment, Tenure, and Removal of Tribunal Members Undermine the Constitutional Balance of Power.
1 Jan 1970The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions challenging the vires of the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021. The petitioners, led by the Madras Bar Assoc...
- 83
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Injunction in Specific Performance Suit — Balance of Convenience Favors Plaintiff. Trial Court's Order Restraining Defendant from Creating Third Party Interest Upheld as Plaintiff Established Prima Facie Case and Irreparable Loss.
2 Aug 2023The appellant, Smt. Manisha Kode, challenged an order dated 24.01.2023 passed by the Civil Judge Senior Division, Aurangabad in Special Civil Suit No....
- 68
High Court
Karnataka High Court Quashes Ex-Parte Ad-Interim Injunction Order Against Digital Media Journalist in Defamation Suit Concerning Dharmasthala Temple Allegations. The High Court found the order granting mandatory injunction without hearing the petitioner and without reasons was illegal and unconstitutional prior restraint.
1 Aug 2025The writ petition was filed by a digital media journalist (defendant No. 66 in the underlying defamation suit) challenging an ex-parte ad-interim inju...
- 51
High Court
Bombay High Court Refers Questions on Scope of Appellate Interference in Interim Injunction Orders to Larger Bench. Division Bench Noted Conflict Between Precedents on Whether Injunction Orders Are Discretionary or Prima Facie Adjudication, Impacting Appeal Scope Under Order 43 Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
28 Apr 2025The Bombay High Court, constituted as a larger bench, was seized of a reference made by a Division Bench owing to irreconcilable conflict in precedent...
- 25
