KAHC010085932008_1
10 Aug 2018...
Search Results for "Central Government Authority"
7125 result(s) found
Found 7125 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in CENVAT Credit Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Non-supply of documents and denial of cross-examination vitiated the notice under Article 226 of the Constitution.
8 Apr 2021The petitioner, Supermax Personal Care Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing excisable goods such as safety razors, blades, and shaving system...
- 82
High Court
- 16
High Court
High Court of Karnataka hears multiple writ petitions seeking to quash land acquisition notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners challenged the preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 issued under the Land Acquisition Act and the Bangalore Development Authority Act.
11 Jul 2014The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore heard a batch of writ petitions filed by numerous landowners. The petitioners sought to quash the preliminary...
- 50
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals by States of Karnataka and Kerala in Lottery Tax Dispute — State Legislatures Have Competence to Tax Lotteries Under Entry 62 List II. Regulatory Entry 40 List I Does Not Bar State Taxation of Lotteries Organised by Other States.
23 Mar 2022The Supreme Court considered appeals by the States of Karnataka and Kerala against judgments of their respective High Courts which had struck down sta...
- 168
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds CESTAT's Remand Order in Central Excise Valuation Dispute — Evasion of Duty Based on Undervaluation of Plywood/Block Boards. The Court Held That the Adjudicating Authority Must Provide a Reasoned Order After Proper Cross-Examination and Consideration of Evidence, and That the Tribunal's Remand for De Novo Adjudication Was Justified.
19 Aug 2020The case involves appeals by the Commissioner of Central Excise against orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) that...
- 280
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Reviews Its Own Judgment That Struck Down Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearance Notifications Under Environment (Protection) Act. Review Petition Seeks Recall Citing Overlooked Binding Precedents.
1 Jan 1970Background: The present matter is a review petition arising from the Supreme Court's judgment in Vanashakti v. Union of India, dated 16 May 2025, whic...
- 53
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Notification Declaring PFI Unlawful with Immediate Effect under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. Court Holds That Reasons for Immediate Effect are Sufficiently Disclosed in Notification Itself as Required by Section 3(3) Proviso.
30 Nov 2022The petitioner, claiming to be the President of Popular Front of India (PFI), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the H...
- 23
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Three Writ Petitions Challenging Government Orders and Lokayukta Charge Memoes in Basava Vasati Housing Scheme Scam Case. Court Examines Legality of Disciplinary Proceedings Under Karnataka Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1957 and Lokayukta Act, 1984.
23 Jul 2021Three writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Karnataka by retired engineers of Karnataka Rural Infrastructure Development Limited (KRIDL),...
- 10
High Court
Bombay High Court Admits Central Excise Appeal on Conditional Exemption and Cenvat Credit. The Appeal Raises Substantial Questions of Law Regarding Notification No.6/2006-C.E. and Credit on Aggregates Used in Export.
9 Sep 2014The Bombay High Court heard a central excise appeal filed by Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. against the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-V. The appell...
