Search Results for "Article 320"

489 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 489 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Quo-Warranto Petitions Challenging KPSC Appointments, Upholds Executive Power Under Article 316. Court Rules That Article 316 is a Complete Code and No Rules are Required for Appointing Chairman and Members of the State Public Service Commission.

Two public interest litigations were filed by Shashi Prasad Gandhi and T. Narasimhamurthy challenging the appointments of the Chairman and members of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Short Delivery in Multimodal Transport Due to Limitation Under Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925. The court held that the suit filed beyond one year from delivery was time-barred and plaintiff failed to prove short delivery.

The plaintiff, M/s. Assobhai Bhanji and Sons, a registered partnership firm engaged in import and export of dairy and agro products, filed a suit agai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Administrator’s Report for Recovery of Diverted Estate Assets in Testamentary Suit. Court Appointed Administrator Seeks Directions Against Defendant for Unauthorized Diversion of Deceased’s Funds to Various Entities.

The matter concerned the administration of the estate of Purvez Burjor Dalal, who died in Mumbai on 7 December 2011. A testamentary suit was institute...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Industrial Dispute Case — Section 17B Wages Must Include Allowances, Not Just Basic Wage. The court held that wages under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 must be the full wages last drawn, including all allowances, and not merely the basic wage.

The appellant, Amit Kumar, was a senior office assistant employed by Indian Airlines Ltd. He was removed from service on 24th June 2002 after a depart...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010211662021_1

Background: The case involves multiple writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Application Under Section 28-A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Condoning Delay Due to Lack of Knowledge. Delay in Filing Application for Enhanced Compensation Condoned as Petitioner Had No Knowledge of Reference Court Judgment and Acted Promptly.

The petitioner, Sheshabai @ Subhadrabai w/o Gyanoba Madale, owned land in Survey No./Gat No.227/5 and 227/9 at village Sakol, Taluka Shirur Anantpal, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 2207 OF 2005

The petitioner, a Hindi Trained Graduate Teacher with Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (KVS), was appointed at Bangalore in 1989 and made permanent in 199...