Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Wakf Property Tenancy Dispute, Upholding High Court's Eviction Order. The Court affirmed that tenancy rights in joint Hindu family property cannot be surrendered by the Karta without consent of coparceners, making subsequent lease to appellant illegal under Hindu law principles.

  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a tenancy in premises owned by the Bihar State Sunni Wakf Board. The plaintiff filed a suit for declaration as a tenant, claiming hereditary tenancy rights through a joint Hindu family lineage starting from Ram Sewak Ram, who ran a hotel business on the premises. After his death, the tenancy allegedly passed to his nephew Devendra Prasad Sinha as Karta. In 1996, Devendra Prasad Sinha surrendered the tenancy to the Mutawalli of the Wakf, and the appellant was inducted as a new tenant. The plaintiff challenged this surrender, arguing it was invalid without consent of other coparceners. The suit was initially filed in civil court but transferred to the Wakf Tribunal at the instance of the appellant and Wakf Board. The Tribunal dismissed the suit, finding no evidence of joint family business. The High Court, in a writ petition, set aside the Tribunal's order, holding that the Karta could not surrender tenancy rights without coparceners' consent and directed eviction of the appellant. On appeal, the Supreme Court considered arguments on the Tribunal's jurisdiction, maintainability of the writ petition, and the validity of the surrender. The Court held that the appellant could not dispute the Tribunal's jurisdiction after seeking the transfer. On merits, the Court upheld the High Court's finding that the tenancy was joint family property and the surrender by the Karta without consent was invalid, affirming the eviction order. The appeal was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Jurisdiction of Wakf Tribunal - Transfer of Suit - Wakf Act, 1995, Sections 85, 85A - The appellant and Wakf Board applied for transfer of a civil suit to the Wakf Tribunal, which was ordered by the Munsif and upheld by the High Court - The Supreme Court held that the parties cannot dispute the Tribunal's jurisdiction after having sought the transfer, applying the principle of approbate and reprobate - The order attained finality inter-parties (Paras 13-14).

B) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Article 226/227 of Constitution - Maintainability Against Wakf Tribunal Order - The appellant argued that a writ petition under Article 226 was not maintainable as only a revision under Section 83(9) of Wakf Act, 1995 was permissible - The Court did not decide this issue as it found the High Court's order unsustainable on merits (Paras 9, 15).

C) Hindu Law - Joint Hindu Family - Tenancy Rights - Surrender by Karta - The plaintiff claimed tenancy rights in Wakf property through joint Hindu family succession from Ram Sewak Ram to Devendra Prasad Sinha (Karta) - The High Court held that the Karta could not surrender tenancy rights on 31.5.1996 without consent of other coparceners, making the appellant's induction illegal - The Supreme Court upheld this finding, noting the tenancy was joint family property (Paras 8, 11, 15).

D) Property Law - Tenancy - Eviction - Direction for Possession - The High Court directed dispossession of the appellant tenant and handover of vacant possession to the plaintiff after finding the surrender and subsequent lease illegal - The Supreme Court affirmed this direction, dismissing the appeal (Para 15).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Court erred in allowing a writ petition to set aside the Wakf Tribunal's order, holding that the Karta of a joint Hindu family could not surrender tenancy rights without consent of other coparceners, and directing eviction of the appellant tenant.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the High Court's order that the Karta could not surrender tenancy rights without consent of coparceners, making the appellant's induction illegal, and affirmed the direction to dispossess the appellant and handover possession to the plaintiff.

Law Points

  • Jurisdiction of Wakf Tribunal under Wakf Act
  • 1995
  • Tenancy rights in joint Hindu family property
  • Surrender of tenancy by Karta without consent of coparceners
  • Maintainability of writ petition under Article 226/227 of Constitution against Tribunal order
  • Principle of approbate and reprobate
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (4) 16

Civil Appeal No. 6149 of 2015

2021-04-05

Hemant Gupta, J.

Kiran Devi

The Bihar State Sunni Wakf Board & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal against High Court order in a writ petition regarding tenancy rights in Wakf property

Remedy Sought

Appellant seeks to set aside High Court order directing her eviction and handover of possession to plaintiff

Filing Reason

Challenge to High Court's finding that surrender of tenancy by Karta without coparceners' consent was invalid

Previous Decisions

Civil suit dismissed by Wakf Tribunal; High Court allowed writ petition, set aside Tribunal order, and directed eviction

Issues

Whether the Wakf Tribunal had jurisdiction to entertain the suit Whether the writ petition under Article 226/227 was maintainable against the Tribunal order Whether the Karta could surrender tenancy rights without consent of coparceners Whether the High Court erred in reappreciating facts

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued Tribunal lacked jurisdiction per Ramesh Gobindram, writ petition not maintainable, High Court cannot reappreciate facts, surrender was valid Respondent argued nomenclature of jurisdiction immaterial, tenancy is joint family property, Karta cannot surrender without consent

Ratio Decidendi

Tenancy rights in joint Hindu family property cannot be surrendered by the Karta without the consent of other coparceners; parties cannot approbate and reprobate by disputing jurisdiction after seeking transfer of suit to Wakf Tribunal.

Judgment Excerpts

The challenge in the present appeal is to an order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna dated 6.2.2013 The High Court in a writ petition against the said order held that the suit premises were let out to Ram Sewak Ram who carried out joint family hotel business The parties cannot be permitted to approbate and reprobate in the same breath

Procedural History

Plaintiff filed suit in civil court in 1996; suit transferred to Wakf Tribunal in 2009 at instance of appellant and Wakf Board; Tribunal dismissed suit in 2012; High Court allowed writ petition in 2013, setting aside Tribunal order and directing eviction; Supreme Court appeal filed in 2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Wakf Act, 1995: Sections 85, 85A, 83(9)
  • Constitution of India: Article 226, Article 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Wakf Property Tenancy Dispute, Upholding High Court's Eviction Order. The Court affirmed that tenancy rights in joint Hindu family property cannot be surrendered by the Karta without consent of coparceners, making su...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Service Law Regularization Case, Upholding Legality of Long-Standing Appointment and Right to Regularization Under UP Rules. The Court distinguished between illegal and irregular appointments, applying the Umadevi excep...