Search Results for "Judicial Compliance"

4869 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4869 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Daughter's Appeal Against Dismissal of Petition Challenging Father's Marriage Under Order 2 Rule 2 CPC. Family Court Erred in Holding That Earlier Suit for Declaration of Marriage as Void Was Barred by Res Judicata as Cause of Action Was Different.

The appellant, Mrs. Nayana M. Ramani, is the married daughter of late Mr. Navnitlal R. Shah. The respondent, Mrs. Fizzah Navnitlal Shah, claims to hav...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings in NI Act Complaint for Non-Compliance with BNSS Section 223 Procedure. Mandatory hearing of accused at cognizance stage under first proviso to Section 223 BNSS applies to complaints under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, Ashok S/o Siddappa Bankar, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Food Adulteration Case for Non-Compliance of Mandatory Notice Under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act. Failure to Serve Notice to Accused for Right to Get Sample Examined by Central Laboratory Vitiates Prosecution.

The case involves a criminal revision filed by Rajaram and Nandlal Kanekar, vendors and proprietor of M/s Kumar Masala Gruha Udyog, against their conv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition for Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Due to Lack of Locus Standi. Petitioner Failed to Prove Ownership or Possession of the Acquired Land Under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Fakhruddin s/o Hyderali (since deceased, represented by his legal heir Mustafa Fakhruddin Ambawala) challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Arrangement for Amalgamation of Five Transferor Companies with Unichem Laboratories Limited. Scheme held fair and reasonable under Sections 391-394 of Companies Act, 1956, despite shareholder objection.

The judgment concerns five Company Scheme Petitions filed under Sections 391 to 394 read with Sections 80, 100 to 103 of the Companies Act, 1956, seek...