High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings in NI Act Complaint for Non-Compliance with BNSS Section 223 Procedure. Mandatory hearing of accused at cognizance stage under first proviso to Section 223 BNSS applies to complaints under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: KALABURAGI In Favour of Accused
  • 186
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Ashok S/o Siddappa Bankar, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Section 528 of BNSS) seeking to quash the entire proceedings in CC No.12253/2024 pending before the I Addl. Civil Judge and JMFC Court, Hubballi, for the alleged offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The respondent, Fayaz Aahmad S/o Aurangzeb Naikar, had filed the complaint. The petitioner contended that the proceedings lacked procedural compliance as the Magistrate had not heard the accused before taking cognizance, as required by the first proviso to Section 223 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS). The court framed the issue of whether the procedure of hearing the accused at the stage of taking cognizance under the first proviso to Section 223 BNSS applies to complaints under Section 138 of the NI Act. The court examined Section 223 BNSS, which deals with examination of the complainant, and noted that the first proviso mandates that the Magistrate shall hear the accused before taking cognizance if the complaint is made by a public servant or court, or if the accused is not likely to abscond. The court held that this procedure applies to all complaints, including those under Section 138 of the NI Act. Since the Magistrate had not complied with this mandatory requirement, the proceedings were quashed as void ab initio. The petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Cognizance of Offence - Hearing of Accused - First proviso to Section 223 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - The court considered whether the mandatory procedure of hearing the accused before taking cognizance under the first proviso to Section 223 BNSS applies to complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Held that the procedure applies and non-compliance renders the proceedings void ab initio. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the procedure of hearing the accused at the stage of taking cognizance as prescribed in the first proviso to Section 223 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 applies to complaints for offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The entire proceedings in CC No.12253/2024 pending on the file of the I Addl. Civil Judge and JMFC Court, Hubballi, are quashed.

Law Points

  • Mandatory hearing of accused at cognizance stage
  • First proviso to Section 223 BNSS applies to Section 138 NI Act complaints
  • Non-compliance renders proceedings void ab initio
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (KAR) (04) 59

CRL.P No. 101514 of 2025

2025-04-28

Shivashankar Amarannavar

Saiyad D. Mulla, G.V. Bharamagoudar, Bhagyashree N. Bikkannavar

Ashok S/o. Siddappa Bankar

Fayaz Aahmad S/o. Aurangzeb Naikar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of proceedings in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner/accused sought quashing of entire proceedings in CC No.12253/2024 for lack of procedural compliance.

Filing Reason

The Magistrate took cognizance without hearing the accused as required by the first proviso to Section 223 of BNSS.

Issues

Whether the procedure of hearing the accused at the stage of taking cognizance under the first proviso to Section 223 BNSS applies to complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the proceedings lacked procedural compliance as the accused was not heard before taking cognizance.

Ratio Decidendi

The first proviso to Section 223 of BNSS mandates that the Magistrate shall hear the accused before taking cognizance of a complaint. This procedure applies to all complaints, including those under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Non-compliance renders the proceedings void ab initio.

Judgment Excerpts

The question that arises for consideration is that the procedure of hearing accused at the stage of taking cognizance as prescribed in the first proviso to Section 223 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 apply to the complaints for offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Procedural History

The complaint was filed before the I Addl. Civil Judge and JMFC Court, Hubballi, which took cognizance without hearing the accused. The accused then filed this petition under Section 482 CrPC before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench.

Acts & Sections

  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: 223
  • Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: 138
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Order of Acquittal Restored Due to Non-Prosecution by Complainant. The High Court held that the Sessions Court erred in restoring a complaint dismissed under Sect...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Prima Facie False Allegations and Lack of Public View Element. The court held that the bar under Section 18 of the SC/ST Act does not apply when the ingredients of Section...