Search Results for "tribunal's jurisdiction"

8912 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8912 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows CGHS Reimbursement Claim for Emergency Treatment Without Prior Referral. Petitioner's husband admitted in emergency to empanelled hospital; denial of balance reimbursement set aside.

The petitioner, Bina Saxena, is the widow of a Central Government pensioner who was a beneficiary of the Central Government Health Scheme (CGHS). Her ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Upholds Award as Not Suffering from Patent Illegality or Being Against Public Policy, Refusing to Reappreciate Evidence.

The petitioner, Angel Capital & Debt Market Limited, a stock broker, challenged an arbitral award dated 16 May 2009 under Section 34 of the Arbitratio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Order in Insolvency Resolution Plan Approval Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Resolution Plan Found Compliant with Section 30(2) and Binding on All Stakeholders Despite Pending Creditor Claim Challenges.

The appeal arose under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against a judgment dated 4 January 2021 of the National Company Law App...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Whether Civil Suit for Recovery Survives Approval of Resolution Plan Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The petition raises the question of the overriding effect of the IBC on pending civil proceedings.

The matter arose from a summary suit filed by respondent No.1, a proprietary concern, under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for rec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Recruitment Rules of 2015, Dismisses Petition Challenging RFO Seniority List. Petitioners' reliance on superseded 1998 Rules and failure to include all affected parties lead to dismissal; seniority list validated under 2015 Rules.

The petitioners challenged the seniority list based on the Recruitment Rules of 1998, arguing against the application of the Recruitment Rules of 2015...