Search Results for "Industrial Court discretion"

1669 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1669 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Sarpanch for Interest in Contracts Under Section 14(1)(g) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Payments to Husband's Relatives Constitute Disqualification.

The petitioner, Archana Neharkar, was the Sarpanch of Kutewadi Grampanchayat in Beed district. She was disqualified by the Collector, Beed, on 5 Janua...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Award of Reinstatement and Back Wages to Conductor Dismissed for Misconduct — MSRTC v. B.D. Chavhan. Employer's Disciplinary Action Set Aside as Domestic Inquiry Was Not Properly Conducted and Findings Were Not Based on Legal Evidence.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged an award of the Labour Court, Aurangabad, in Reference IDA No.36/1985...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs Consideration of Representation to Adjourn No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat President — Petitioners Who Signed Notice Cannot Withdraw Support Without Proper Procedure

The petitioners, Sri T. Rajakumar Naik and Smt. Gangamma, were elected members of Kanchipura Gram Panchayat in May 2010. On 30.12.2013, 14 members, in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Entry Tax Case — Pre-deposit Condition for Appeal Not Applicable When Entire Tax is Disputed. Section 28(3)(a) of Goa Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 2000 requires pre-deposit only of tax 'not disputed' in appeal, not disputed tax.

The petitioner, M/s. West Coast Ingots Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, was served a demand notice under the Goa Tax o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Return of Plaint for Non-Compliance of Section 80 CPC. Court holds that once notice under Section 80 CPC is waived, the suit cannot be returned for compliance of the same provision.

The petitioners filed Regular Civil Suit No.335/2021 seeking permanent injunction against alienation of suit property. They also filed an application ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Deemed Dealer under MVAT Act and Prospective Effect of Tax Liability. High Court of Bombay Decides on Tax Liability of Government-Constituted Trust under Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002

On the Issue of Deemed Dealer: The Court held that SASF was a “deemed dealer” under Section 2(8) of the MVAT Act. The Court found that SASF fel...